From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355256B025F
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 23:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id 83so167533598pgb.14
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com. [134.134.136.100])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p188si4864329pga.521.2017.08.14.20.15.25
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:15:24 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/wait: Break up long wake list walk
Message-ID: <20170815031524.GC28715@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <84c7f26182b7f4723c0fe3b34ba912a9de92b8b7.1502758114.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFznC1wqBSfYr8=92LGqz5-F6fHMzdXoqM4aOYx8sT1Dhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170815022743.GB28715@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFyHVV=eTtAocUrNLymQOCj55qkF58+N+Tjr2YS9TrqFow@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyHVV=eTtAocUrNLymQOCj55qkF58+N+Tjr2YS9TrqFow@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

> That is what the patch does now, and that is why I dislike the patch.
> 
> So I _am_ NAK'ing the patch if nobody is willing to even try alternatives.

Ok, perhaps larger hash table is the right solution for this one.

But what should we do when some other (non page) wait queue runs into the
same problem?

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>