From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B68A440846 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:44:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id l124so562270wmg.8 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outbound-smtp04.blacknight.com (outbound-smtp04.blacknight.com. [81.17.249.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i21si2185640wmc.264.2017.08.24.13.44.50 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail05.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.26]) by outbound-smtp04.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7B2F41C0 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:44:48 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/wait: Break up long wake list walk Message-ID: <20170824204448.if2mve3iy5k425di@techsingularity.net> References: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378A24A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378A377@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378A8AB@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <6e8b81de-e985-9222-29c5-594c6849c351@linux.intel.com> <85fb2a78-cbb7-dceb-12e8-7d18519c30a0@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Tim Chen , "Liang, Kan" , Mel Gorman , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Jan Kara , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:16:15AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > These changes look fine. We are testing them now. > > Does the second patch in the series look okay to you? > > I didn't really have any reaction to that one, as long as Mel&co are > ok with it, I'm fine with it. > I've no strong objections or concerns. I'm disappointed that the original root cause for this could not be found but hope that eventually a reproducible test case will eventually be available. Despite having access to a 4-socket box, I was still unable to create a workload that caused large delays on wakeup. I'm going to have to stop as I don't think it's possible to create on that particular machine for whatever reason. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org