From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Prakash Gupta <guptap@codeaurora.org>
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:28:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170830132828.0bf9b9bc64f51362a64a6694@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504078343-28754-1-git-send-email-guptap@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:02:22 +0530 Prakash Gupta <guptap@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> The stacktraces always begin as follows:
>
> [<c00117b4>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x0/0x98
> [<c0011870>] save_stack_trace+0x24/0x28
> ...
>
> This is because the stack trace code includes the stack frames for itself.
> This is incorrect behaviour, and also leads to "skip" doing the wrong thing
> (which is the number of stack frames to avoid recording.)
>
> Perversely, it does the right thing when passed a non-current thread. Fix
> this by ensuring that we have a known constant number of frames above the
> main stack trace function, and always skip these.
>
> This was fixed for arch arm by Commit 3683f44c42e9 ("ARM: stacktrace: avoid
> listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace")
I can take this (with acks, please?)
3683f44c42e9 has a cc:stable but your patch does not. Should it?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 7:32 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace Prakash Gupta
2017-08-30 7:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, page_owner: Skip unnecessary stack_trace entries Prakash Gupta
2017-08-31 7:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-09-01 5:00 ` Prakash Gupta
2017-08-30 20:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-08-31 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace Prakash Gupta
2017-09-04 10:29 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170830132828.0bf9b9bc64f51362a64a6694@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=guptap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).