From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FBF2802FE for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:35:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id q68so12899927pgq.6 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 05:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com. [67.231.153.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a61si1164188pla.728.2017.09.06.05.34.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Sep 2017 05:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:33:45 +0100 From: Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [v7 2/5] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Message-ID: <20170906123345.GA12904@castle> References: <20170904142108.7165-1-guro@fb.com> <20170904142108.7165-3-guro@fb.com> <20170905145700.fd7jjd37xf4tb55h@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170905202357.GA10535@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <20170906083413.4nzwc27fk3bu2ye4@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170906083413.4nzwc27fk3bu2ye4@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Vladimir Davydov , Johannes Weiner , Tetsuo Handa , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:34:13AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 05-09-17 21:23:57, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:57:00PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > > @@ -810,6 +810,9 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim) > > > > struct mm_struct *mm; > > > > bool can_oom_reap = true; > > > > > > > > + if (is_global_init(victim) || (victim->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) > > > > + return; > > > > + > > > > > > This will leak a reference to the victim AFACS > > > > Good catch! > > I didn't fix this after moving reference dropping into __oom_kill_process(). > > Fixed. > > Btw. didn't you want to check > victim->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN > > here as well? Maybe I've missed something but you still can kill a task > which is oom disabled which I thought we agreed is the wrong thing to > do. Added. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org