From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f70.google.com (mail-wm0-f70.google.com [74.125.82.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91E2440460 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 05:09:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f70.google.com with SMTP id 198so3717319wmg.8 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 02:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t33si2965804edd.129.2017.11.09.02.09.23 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 02:09:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:09:20 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't warn about allocations which stall for too long Message-ID: <20171109100920.f7ox4nc63dr44gva@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1509017339-4802-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20171026114100.tfb3xemvumg2a7su@dhcp22.suse.cz> <91bdbdea-3f33-b7c0-8345-d0fa8c7f1cf1@sonymobile.com> <20171109085249.guihvx5tzm77u3qk@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: peter enderborg Cc: peter enderborg , Tetsuo Handa , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Vlastimil Babka , "yuwang.yuwang" On Thu 09-11-17 10:34:46, peter enderborg wrote: > On 11/09/2017 09:52 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > I am not sure. I would rather see a tracepoint to mark the allocator > > entry. This would allow both 1) measuring the allocation latency (to > > compare it to the trace_mm_page_alloc and 2) check for stalls with > > arbitrary user defined timeout (just print all allocations which haven't > > passed trace_mm_page_alloc for the given amount of time). > > Traces are not that expensive, but there are more than few in calls > in this path. And Im trying to keep it as small that it can used for > maintenance versions too. > > This is suggestion is a quick way of keeping the current solution for > the ones that are interested the slow allocations. If we are going > for a solution with a time-out parameter from the user what interface > do you suggest to do this configuration. A filter parameter for the > event? I meant to do all that in postprocessing. So no specific API is needed, just parse the output. Anyway, it seems that the printk will be put in shape in a forseeable future so we might preserve the stall warning after all. It is the show_mem part which is interesting during that warning. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org