From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] x86/mm: Do not allow non-MAP_FIXED mapping across DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW border
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:27:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171115112702.e2m66wons37imtcj@node.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711142354520.2221@nanos>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:00:46AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:54:52PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:01:50PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > @@ -198,11 +199,14 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct fi
> > > > > /* requesting a specific address */
> > > > > if (addr) {
> > > > > addr = PAGE_ALIGN(addr);
> > > > > + if (!mmap_address_hint_valid(addr, len))
> > > > > + goto get_unmapped_area;
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > Here and in hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(), we should align the addr after
> > > > the check, not before. Otherwise the alignment itself can bring us over
> > > > the borderline as we align up.
> > >
> > > Hmm, then I wonder whether the next check against vm_start_gap() which
> > > checks against the aligned address is correct:
> > >
> > > addr = PAGE_ALIGN(addr);
> > > vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> > >
> > > if (end - len >= addr &&
> > > (!vma || addr + len <= vm_start_gap(vma)))
> > > return addr;
> >
> > I think the check is correct. The check is against resulting addresses
> > that end up in vm_start/vm_end. In our case we want to figure out what
> > user asked for.
>
> Well, but then checking just against the user supplied addr is only half of
> the story.
>
> addr = boundary - PAGE_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE / 2;
> len = PAGE_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE / 2;
>
> That fits, but then after alignment we end up with
>
> addr = boudary - PAGE_SIZE;
>
> and due to len > PAGE_SIZE this will result in a mapping which crosses the
> boundary, right? So checking against the PAGE_ALIGN(addr) should be the
> right thing to do.
IIUC, this is only the case if 'len' is not aligned, right?
>From what I see we expect caller to align it (and mm/mmap.c does this, I
haven't checked other callers).
And hugetlb would actively reject non-aligned len.
I *think* we should be fine with checking unaligned 'addr'.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 13:43 [PATCHv2 1/2] x86/mm: Do not allow non-MAP_FIXED mapping across DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW border Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-14 13:43 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] x86/selftests: Add test for mapping placement for 5-level paging Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-14 16:01 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] x86/mm: Do not allow non-MAP_FIXED mapping across DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW border Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-14 19:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-14 20:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-14 20:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-14 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-14 22:27 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-14 23:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-15 11:27 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2017-11-15 11:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-15 12:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-15 14:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-15 14:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-15 14:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-15 14:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-11-15 14:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171115112702.e2m66wons37imtcj@node.shutemov.name \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).