From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98986B0261 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:25:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id y2so6804894pgv.8 for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:25:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [65.50.211.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o3si5223411pls.289.2017.12.01.09.25.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:25:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:25:19 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 05/10] xbitmap: add more operations Message-ID: <20171201172519.GA27192@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1511963726-34070-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1511963726-34070-6-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <201711301934.CDC21800.FSLtJFFOOVQHMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <5A210C96.8050208@intel.com> <201712012202.BDE13557.MJFQLtOOHVOFSF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F739376DA1@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F739376DA1@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Wang, Wei W" Cc: Tetsuo Handa , "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "mst@redhat.com" , "mhocko@kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mawilcox@microsoft.com" , "david@redhat.com" , "cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" , "mgorman@techsingularity.net" , "aarcange@redhat.com" , "amit.shah@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "liliang.opensource@gmail.com" , "yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" , "quan.xu@aliyun.com" , "nilal@redhat.com" , "riel@redhat.com" On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:09:08PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Friday, December 1, 2017 9:02 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > If start == end is legal, > > > > for (; start < end; start = (start | (IDA_BITMAP_BITS - 1)) + 1) { > > > > makes this loop do nothing because 10 < 10 is false. > > How about "start <= end "? Don't ask Tetsuo for his opinion, write some userspace code that uses it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org