From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f71.google.com (mail-pl0-f71.google.com [209.85.160.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4226B0007 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:10:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f71.google.com with SMTP id b65-v6so4290848plb.5 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2-v6si6528981pgu.420.2018.06.15.07.10.11 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:10:08 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/e820: put !E820_TYPE_RAM regions into memblock.reserved Message-ID: <20180615141008.GJ24039@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180613054107.GA5329@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180613090700.GG13364@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180614051618.GB17860@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180614053859.GA9863@techadventures.net> <20180614063454.GA32419@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180614213033.GA19374@techadventures.net> <20180615010927.GC1196@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180615072947.GB23273@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20180615084142.GE24039@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180615140000.44tht4f3ek3lh2u2@xakep.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180615140000.44tht4f3ek3lh2u2@xakep.localdomain> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Naoya Horiguchi , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Oscar Salvador , Oscar Salvador , Steven Sistare , Daniel Jordan , Matthew Wilcox , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "mingo@kernel.org" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , Huang Ying On Fri 15-06-18 10:00:00, Pavel Tatashin wrote: [...] > But, I think the 2nd patch with the optimization above should go along this > this fix. Yes, ideally with some numbers. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs