From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f199.google.com (mail-qk0-f199.google.com [209.85.220.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDC86B0003 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2018 23:42:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f199.google.com with SMTP id c3-v6so17899749qkb.2 for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 20:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com. [66.187.233.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q1-v6si14766174qki.179.2018.07.01.20.42.35 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Jul 2018 20:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:42:21 +0800 From: Baoquan He Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/sparse: add sparse_init_nid() Message-ID: <20180702034221.GR3223@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20180702020417.21281-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <20180702020417.21281-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <20180702021121.GL3223@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20180702023130.GM3223@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20180702025343.GN3223@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20180702031417.GP3223@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Steven Sistare , Daniel Jordan , LKML , Andrew Morton , kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, Michal Hocko , Linux Memory Management List , dan.j.williams@intel.com, jack@suse.cz, jglisse@redhat.com, Souptick Joarder , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Vlastimil Babka , Wei Yang , dave.hansen@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, mingo@kernel.org, osalvador@techadventures.net On 07/01/18 at 11:28pm, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > > So, on the first failure, we even stop trying to populate other > > > sections. No more memory to do so. > > > > This is the thing I worry about. In old sparse_mem_maps_populate_node() > > you can see, when not present or failed to populate, just continue. This > > is the main difference between yours and the old code. The key logic is > > changed here. > > > > I do not see how we can succeed after the first failure. We still > allocate from the same node: > > sparse_mem_map_populate() may fail only if we could not allocate large > enough buffer vmemmap_buf_start earlier. > > This means that in: > sparse_mem_map_populate() > vmemmap_populate() > vmemmap_populate_hugepages() > vmemmap_alloc_block_buf() (no buffer, so call allocator) > vmemmap_alloc_block(size, node); > __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(node, size, size, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS)); > memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw() -> Nothing changes for > this call to succeed. So, all consequent calls to > sparse_mem_map_populate() in this node will fail as well. Yes, you are right, it's improvement. Thanks. > > > > > > Forgot mentioning it's the vervion in mm/sparse-vmemmap.c > > Sorry, I do not understand what is vervion. Typo, 'version', should be. Sorry for that.