From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175B96B0269 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:07:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id u1-v6so3547486wrs.18 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz. [195.113.26.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1-v6si4020822wrr.220.2018.07.11.14.07.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:07:02 +0200 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/39 v7] PTI support for x86-32 Message-ID: <20180711210702.GA23921@amd> References: <1531308586-29340-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Anvin , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Andrew Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Gro=DF?= , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Will Deacon , "Liguori, Anthony" , Daniel Gruss , Hugh Dickins , Kees Cook , Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , "David H . Gutteridge" , Joerg Roedel --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed 2018-07-11 09:28:39, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:30 AM Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > I did the load-testing again with 'perf top', the ldt_gdt > > self-test and a kernel-compile running in a loop again. >=20 > So none of the patches looked scary to me, but then, neither did > earlier versions. >=20 > It's the testing that worries me most. Pretty much no developers run > 32-bit any more, and I'd be most worried about the odd interactions > that might be hw-specific. Some crazy EFI mapping setup or the similar > odd case that simply requires a particular configuration or setup. I tested previous version of the series, and I keep testing -next on thinkpad X60 every week or so. I try to test every major release on T40p. > But I guess those issues will never be found until we just spring this > all on the unsuspecting public. Sounds like a plan. Testing gets easier once patch reaches -next or mainline... Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAltGcXYACgkQMOfwapXb+vLyIgCgrLHSw4fI1oPd+6TIcFvflT7F 3ucAnAr3LZNxy7dELmcZ0Y5nmY8G1yI2 =IiwM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--