From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0B98E0001 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:06:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id e11so698543edv.20 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c8-v6si2669988edc.311.2018.09.25.23.06.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:06:24 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, thp: always specify ineligible vmas as nh in smaps Message-ID: <20180926060624.GA18685@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180924195603.GJ18685@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180924200258.GK18685@dhcp22.suse.cz> <0aa3eb55-82c0-eba3-b12c-2ba22e052a8e@suse.cz> <20180925202959.GY18685@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180925150406.872aab9f4f945193e5915d69@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180925150406.872aab9f4f945193e5915d69@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Alexey Dobriyan , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue 25-09-18 15:04:06, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:45:19 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > > > > > It is also used in > > > > automated testing to ensure that vmas get disabled for thp appropriately > > > > and we used "nh" since that is how PR_SET_THP_DISABLE previously enforced > > > > this, and those tests now break. > > > > > > This sounds like a bit of an abuse to me. It shows how an internal > > > implementation detail leaks out to the userspace which is something we > > > should try to avoid. > > > > > > > Well, it's already how this has worked for years before commit > > 1860033237d4 broke it. Changing the implementation in the kernel is fine > > as long as you don't break userspace who relies on what is exported to it > > and is the only way to determine if MADV_NOHUGEPAGE is preventing it from > > being backed by hugepages. > > 1860033237d4 was over a year ago so perhaps we don't need to be > too worried about restoring the old interface. In which case > we have an opportunity to make improvements such as that suggested > by Michal? Yeah, can we add a way to export PR_SET_THP_DISABLE to userspace somehow? E.g. /proc//status. It is a process wide thing so reporting it per VMA sounds strange at best. This would also keep a sane (and currently documented) semantic for the smaps flag to be really hg - huge page advise flag nh - no-huge page advise flag -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs