From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pifang@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Memory hotplug softlock issue
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:31:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181121173123.GS12932@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1811192127130.2848@eggly.anvils>
On Mon 19-11-18 21:44:41, Hugh Dickins wrote:
[...]
> [PATCH] mm: put_and_wait_on_page_locked() while page is migrated
>
> We have all assumed that it is essential to hold a page reference while
> waiting on a page lock: partly to guarantee that there is still a struct
> page when MEMORY_HOTREMOVE is configured, but also to protect against
> reuse of the struct page going to someone who then holds the page locked
> indefinitely, when the waiter can reasonably expect timely unlocking.
I would add the following for the "problem statement". Feel free to
reuse per your preference:
"
An elevated reference count, however, stands in the way of migration and
forces it to fail with a bad timing. This is especially a problem for
memory offlining which retries for ever (or until the operation is
terminated from userspace) because a heavy refault workload can trigger
essentially an endless loop of migration failures. Therefore
__migration_entry_wait is essentially harmful for the even it is waiting
for.
"
> But in fact, so long as wait_on_page_bit_common() does the put_page(),
> and is careful not to rely on struct page contents thereafter, there is
> no need to hold a reference to the page while waiting on it. That does
> mean that this case cannot go back through the loop: but that's fine for
> the page migration case, and even if used more widely, is limited by the
> "Stop walking if it's locked" optimization in wake_page_function().
I would appreciate this would be more explicit about the existence of
the elevated-ref-count problem but it reduces it to a tiny time window
compared to the whole time the waiter is blocked. So a great
improvement.
> Add interface put_and_wait_on_page_locked() to do this, using negative
> value of the lock arg to wait_on_page_bit_common() to implement it.
> No interruptible or killable variant needed yet, but they might follow:
> I have a vague notion that reporting -EINTR should take precedence over
> return from wait_on_page_bit_common() without knowing the page state,
> so arrange it accordingly - but that may be nothing but pedantic.
>
> shrink_page_list()'s __ClearPageLocked(): that was a surprise!
and I can imagine a bad one. Do we really have to be so clever here?
The unlock_page went away in the name of performance (a978d6f521063)
and I would argue that this is a slow path where this is just not worth
it.
> this
> survived a lot of testing before that showed up. It does raise the
> question: should is_page_cache_freeable() and __remove_mapping() now
> treat a PG_waiters page as if an extra reference were held? Perhaps,
> but I don't think it matters much, since shrink_page_list() already
> had to win its trylock_page(), so waiters are not very common there: I
> noticed no difference when trying the bigger change, and it's surely not
> needed while put_and_wait_on_page_locked() is only for page migration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
The patch looks good to me - quite ugly but it doesn't make the existing
code much worse.
With the problem described Vlastimil fixed, feel free to add
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
And thanks for a prompt patch. This is something I've been chasing for
quite some time. __migration_entry_wait came to my radar only recently
because this is an extremely volatile area.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-21 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 7:09 Memory hotplug softlock issue Baoquan He
2018-11-14 7:16 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-14 8:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 9:00 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-14 9:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 9:41 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-14 9:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 10:04 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-14 9:01 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-14 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 9:37 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-14 9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 14:52 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-14 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-15 5:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-15 7:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-15 7:53 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-15 8:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-15 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-15 9:52 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-15 9:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-15 13:12 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-15 13:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-15 13:23 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-15 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-15 13:38 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-15 14:32 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-15 14:34 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-16 1:24 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-16 9:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-17 4:22 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-19 10:52 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-19 12:40 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 14:10 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 16:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-19 16:46 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 16:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-19 16:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-19 17:01 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 17:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 20:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-19 20:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 1:56 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-20 5:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-20 13:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-20 13:58 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-20 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2018-11-21 1:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-21 1:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-21 3:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-21 17:31 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-11-22 1:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-14 10:00 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181121173123.GS12932@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pifang@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).