From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98406B539F for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:02:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 132so2121593wms.3 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:02:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de. [213.95.11.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d206si2256953wmf.57.2018.11.29.09.02.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:02:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:02:06 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4 Message-ID: <20181129170206.GA27951@lst.de> References: <20181114082314.8965-1-hch@lst.de> <20181127074253.GB30186@lst.de> <87zhttfonk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zhttfonk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:05:19PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Is the plan that you take these via the dma-mapping tree or that they go > via powerpc? In principle either way is fine with me. If it goes through the powerpc tree we might run into a few minor conflicts with the dma-mapping tree depending on how some of the current discussions go.