Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, memory_hotplug: __offline_pages fix wrong locking
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:03:07 +0100
Message-ID: <20190115120307.22768-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Jan has noticed that we do double unlock on some failure paths when
offlining a page range. This is indeed the case when test_pages_in_a_zone
respp. start_isolate_page_range fail. This was an omission when forward
porting the debugging patch from an older kernel.

Fix the issue by dropping mem_hotplug_done from the failure condition
and keeping the single unlock in the catch all failure path.

Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Fixes: 7960509329c2 ("mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failure")
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index b9a667d36c55..faeeaccc5fae 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1576,7 +1576,6 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
 	   we assume this for now. .*/
 	if (!test_pages_in_a_zone(start_pfn, end_pfn, &valid_start,
 				  &valid_end)) {
-		mem_hotplug_done();
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		reason = "multizone range";
 		goto failed_removal;
@@ -1591,7 +1590,6 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
 				       MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
 				       SKIP_HWPOISON | REPORT_FAILURE);
 	if (ret) {
-		mem_hotplug_done();
 		reason = "failure to isolate range";
 		goto failed_removal;
 	}
-- 
2.20.1

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, memory_hotplug: __offline_pages fix wrong locking
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:03:07 +0100
Message-ID: <20190115120307.22768-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190115120307.KHg7T4MLJoyn62BBcAjIhJERbh8j-uvmCPH0icrWM18@z> (raw)

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Jan has noticed that we do double unlock on some failure paths when
offlining a page range. This is indeed the case when test_pages_in_a_zone
respp. start_isolate_page_range fail. This was an omission when forward
porting the debugging patch from an older kernel.

Fix the issue by dropping mem_hotplug_done from the failure condition
and keeping the single unlock in the catch all failure path.

Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Fixes: 7960509329c2 ("mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failure")
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index b9a667d36c55..faeeaccc5fae 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1576,7 +1576,6 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
 	   we assume this for now. .*/
 	if (!test_pages_in_a_zone(start_pfn, end_pfn, &valid_start,
 				  &valid_end)) {
-		mem_hotplug_done();
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		reason = "multizone range";
 		goto failed_removal;
@@ -1591,7 +1590,6 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
 				       MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
 				       SKIP_HWPOISON | REPORT_FAILURE);
 	if (ret) {
-		mem_hotplug_done();
 		reason = "failure to isolate range";
 		goto failed_removal;
 	}
-- 
2.20.1


             reply index

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-15 12:03 Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-01-15 12:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-15 13:50 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-01-15 17:02 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190115120307.22768-1-mhocko@kernel.org \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=OSalvador@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/0 linux-mm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-mm linux-mm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm \
		linux-mm@kvack.org
	public-inbox-index linux-mm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kvack.linux-mm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git