From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> To: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>, Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts. Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:45:04 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190128144506.15603-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw) Hi, Mikhail has posted fixes for the two bugs quite some time ago [1]. I have pushed back on those fixes because I believed that it is much better to plug the problem at the initialization time rather than play whack-a-mole all over the hotplug code and find all the places which expect the full memory section to be initialized. We have ended up with 2830bf6f05fb ("mm, memory_hotplug: initialize struct pages for the full memory section") merged and cause a regression [2][3]. The reason is that there might be memory layouts when two NUMA nodes share the same memory section so the merged fix is simply incorrect. In order to plug this hole we really have to be zone range aware in those handlers. I have split up the original patch into two. One is unchanged (patch 2) and I took a different approach for `removable' crash. It would be great if Mikhail could test it still works for his memory layout. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666948 [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125163938.GA20411@dhcp22.suse.cz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> To: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>, Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts. Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:45:04 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190128144506.15603-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw) Message-ID: <20190128144504.HSsPhVgCd8uzSWjRIFNcqTkZTrO1tUx_GpMmL3clqkI@z> (raw) Hi, Mikhail has posted fixes for the two bugs quite some time ago [1]. I have pushed back on those fixes because I believed that it is much better to plug the problem at the initialization time rather than play whack-a-mole all over the hotplug code and find all the places which expect the full memory section to be initialized. We have ended up with 2830bf6f05fb ("mm, memory_hotplug: initialize struct pages for the full memory section") merged and cause a regression [2][3]. The reason is that there might be memory layouts when two NUMA nodes share the same memory section so the merged fix is simply incorrect. In order to plug this hole we really have to be zone range aware in those handlers. I have split up the original patch into two. One is unchanged (patch 2) and I took a different approach for `removable' crash. It would be great if Mikhail could test it still works for his memory layout. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666948 [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125163938.GA20411@dhcp22.suse.cz
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 14:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-01-28 14:45 Michal Hocko [this message] 2019-01-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts Michal Hocko 2019-01-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone Michal Hocko 2019-01-28 14:45 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-29 9:06 ` Oscar Salvador 2019-01-29 9:12 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-30 7:54 ` Oscar Salvador 2019-01-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, memory_hotplug: test_pages_in_a_zone do not pass the end of zone Michal Hocko 2019-01-28 14:45 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-29 9:09 ` Oscar Salvador 2019-01-29 9:13 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts Andrew Morton 2019-01-28 17:50 ` Andrew Morton 2019-01-28 18:41 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-28 18:45 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-29 13:14 ` Gerald Schaefer 2019-01-29 13:49 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-29 14:08 ` Gerald Schaefer 2019-01-29 17:38 ` Mikhail Gavrilov 2019-01-29 20:24 ` Michal Hocko 2019-01-29 20:56 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190128144506.15603-1-mhocko@kernel.org \ --to=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \ --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \ --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \ --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \ --cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).