linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/debug: add a cast to u64 for atomic64_read()
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:18:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190313091844.GA24390@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0QB7+oPz4sfbW_g2EGZZmC=LMEnkMNLCW_FD=fEZoQPA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 03:20:04PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:00 PM Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 12:21 +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 08:58:15PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, Qian Cai wrote:
> > >
> > > Not saying this patch shouldn't go ahead..
> > >
> > > But is there a special reason the atomic64*'s on ppc don't use the u64
> > > type like other archs? Seems like a better thing to fix than adding
> > > casts all over the place.

s64 if anything, atomic stuff is signed (although since we have -fwrapv
it doesn't matter one whit).

> > A bit of history here,
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7344011/#15495901
> 
> Ah, I had already forgotten about that discussion.
> 
> At least the atomic_long part we discussed there has been resolved now
> as part of commit b5d47ef9ea5c ("locking/atomics: Switch to generated
> atomic-long").
> 
> Adding Mark Rutland to Cc, maybe he has some ideas of how to use
> the infrastructure he added to use consistent types for atomic64()
> on the remaining 64-bit architectures.

A quick count shows there's only 5 definitions of atomic64_t in the
tree, it would be trivial to align them on type.

$ git grep "} atomic64_t"
arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h:} atomic64_t;
arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h:} atomic64_t;
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_32.h:} atomic64_t;
include/asm-generic/atomic64.h:} atomic64_t;
include/linux/types.h:} atomic64_t;

Note that the one used in _most_ cases, is the one from linux/types.h,
and that is using 'long'. The others, all typically on ILP32 platforms,
obviously must use long long.

I have no objection to changing the types.h one to long long or all of
them to s64. It really shouldn't matter at all.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-13  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-10 18:30 [PATCH] mm/debug: add a cast to u64 for atomic64_read() Qian Cai
2019-03-11  3:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-03-11 12:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-11 14:00     ` Qian Cai
2019-03-11 14:20       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-13  9:18         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-03-13 13:46           ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-13 14:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 14:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 14:35           ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-13 14:57             ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-13 16:29               ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-11 14:00     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190313091844.GA24390@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).