linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mroos@linux.ee, mingo@redhat.com,
	namit@vmware.com, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 20:33:20 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520.203320.621504228022195532.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e7e674c1fe094cd8dbe0c8933db18be1a37d76d.camel@intel.com>

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 00:20:13 +0000

> This behavior shouldn't happen until modules or BPF are being freed.

Then that would rule out my theory.

The only thing left is whether the permissions are actually set
properly.  If they aren't we'll take an exception when the BPF program
is run and I'm not %100 sure that kernel execute permission violations
are totally handled cleanly.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20 20:07 [PATCH v2] vmalloc: Fix issues with flush flag Rick Edgecombe
2019-05-20 21:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-20 21:48   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-20 21:36 ` Meelis Roos
2019-05-20 22:17   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-20 22:48     ` David Miller
2019-05-21  0:20       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-21  0:33         ` David Miller [this message]
2019-05-21  1:20           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-21  1:43             ` David Miller
2019-05-21  1:59               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-22 17:40                 ` David Miller
2019-05-22 19:26                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-22 22:40                     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-05-24 15:50                       ` Edgecombe, Rick P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190520.203320.621504228022195532.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).