linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] mm/gup: fix omission of check on FOLL_LONGTERM in get_user_pages_fast()
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:29:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611122935.GA9919@dhcp-128-55.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTtS7qOByXBnGzCW-Rm9fiNsVmhQTgqmNU920m77XyAwZQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4028 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:10:15PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:17 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/5/19 7:19 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:49 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > ...
> > >>> --- a/mm/gup.c
> > >>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > >>> @@ -2196,6 +2196,26 @@ static int __gup_longterm_unlocked(unsigned long start, int nr_pages,
> > >>>       return ret;
> > >>>  }
> > >>>
> > >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> > >>> +static inline int reject_cma_pages(int nr_pinned, struct page **pages)
> > >>> +{
> > >>> +     int i;
> > >>> +
> > >>> +     for (i = 0; i < nr_pinned; i++)
> > >>> +             if (is_migrate_cma_page(pages[i])) {
> > >>> +                     put_user_pages(pages + i, nr_pinned - i);
> > >>> +                     return i;
> > >>> +             }
> > >>> +
> > >>> +     return nr_pinned;
> > >>> +}
> > >>
> > >> There's no point in inlining this.
> > > OK, will drop it in V4.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> The code seems inefficient.  If it encounters a single CMA page it can
> > >> end up discarding a possibly significant number of non-CMA pages.  I
> > > The trick is the page is not be discarded, in fact, they are still be
> > > referrenced by pte. We just leave the slow path to pick up the non-CMA
> > > pages again.
> > >
> > >> guess that doesn't matter much, as get_user_pages(FOLL_LONGTERM) is
> > >> rare.  But could we avoid this (and the second pass across pages[]) by
> > >> checking for a CMA page within gup_pte_range()?
> > > It will spread the same logic to hugetlb pte and normal pte. And no
> > > improvement in performance due to slow path. So I think maybe it is
> > > not worth.
> > >
> > >>
> >
> > I think the concern is: for the successful gup_fast case with no CMA
> > pages, this patch is adding another complete loop through all the
> > pages. In the fast case.
> >
> > If the check were instead done as part of the gup_pte_range(), then
> > it would be a little more efficient for that case.
> >
> > As for whether it's worth it, *probably* this is too small an effect to measure.
> > But in order to attempt a measurement: running fio (https://github.com/axboe/fio)
> > with O_DIRECT on an NVMe drive, might shed some light. Here's an fio.conf file
> > that Jan Kara and Tom Talpey helped me come up with, for related testing:
> >
> > [reader]
> > direct=1
> > ioengine=libaio
> > blocksize=4096
> > size=1g
> > numjobs=1
> > rw=read
> > iodepth=64
> >
Unable to get a NVME device to have a test. And when testing fio on the
tranditional disk, I got the error "fio: engine libaio not loadable
fio: failed to load engine
fio: file:ioengines.c:89, func=dlopen, error=libaio: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"

But I found a test case which can be slightly adjusted to met the aim.
It is tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c

Test enviroment:
  MemTotal:       264079324 kB
  MemFree:        262306788 kB
  CmaTotal:              0 kB
  CmaFree:               0 kB
  on AMD EPYC 7601

Test command:
  gup_benchmark -r 100 -n 64
  gup_benchmark -r 100 -n 64 -l
where -r stands for repeat times, -n is nr_pages param for
get_user_pages_fast(), -l is a new option to test FOLL_LONGTERM in fast
path, see a patch at the tail.

Test result:
w/o     477.800000
w/o-l   481.070000
a       481.800000
a-l     640.410000
b       466.240000  (question a: b outperforms w/o ?)
b-l     529.740000

Where w/o is baseline without any patch using v5.2-rc2, a is this series, b
does the check in gup_pte_range(). '-l' means FOLL_LONGTERM.

I am suprised that b-l has about 17% improvement than a. (640.41 -529.74)/640.41
As for "question a: b outperforms w/o ?", I can not figure out why, maybe it can be
considered as variance.

Based on the above result, I think it is better to do the check inside
gup_pte_range().

Any comment?

Thanks,


> Yeah, agreed. Data is more persuasive. Thanks for your suggestion. I
> will try to bring out the result.
> 
> Thanks,
>   Pingfan
> 


[-- Attachment #2: gup_pte_range_check.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1502 bytes --]

---
Patch to do check inside gup_pte_range()

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 2ce3091..ba213a0 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1757,6 +1757,10 @@ static int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 		VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pte_pfn(pte)));
 		page = pte_page(pte);
 
+		if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
+			is_migrate_cma_page(page))
+				goto pte_unmap;
+
 		head = try_get_compound_head(page, 1);
 		if (!head)
 			goto pte_unmap;
@@ -1900,6 +1904,12 @@ static int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t orig, pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
 		refs++;
 	} while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 
+	if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
+		is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
+		*nr -= refs;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	head = try_get_compound_head(pmd_page(orig), refs);
 	if (!head) {
 		*nr -= refs;
@@ -1941,6 +1951,12 @@ static int gup_huge_pud(pud_t orig, pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
 		refs++;
 	} while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 
+	if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
+		is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
+		*nr -= refs;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	head = try_get_compound_head(pud_page(orig), refs);
 	if (!head) {
 		*nr -= refs;
@@ -1978,6 +1994,12 @@ static int gup_huge_pgd(pgd_t orig, pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr,
 		refs++;
 	} while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 
+	if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
+		is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
+		*nr -= refs;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	head = try_get_compound_head(pgd_page(orig), refs);
 	if (!head) {
 		*nr -= refs;

[-- Attachment #3: mm-gup-introduce-LONGTERM_BENCHMARK-in-fast-path.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2525 bytes --]

---
Patch for testing

diff --git a/mm/gup_benchmark.c b/mm/gup_benchmark.c
index 7dd602d..61dec5f 100644
--- a/mm/gup_benchmark.c
+++ b/mm/gup_benchmark.c
@@ -6,8 +6,9 @@
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 
 #define GUP_FAST_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 1, struct gup_benchmark)
-#define GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 2, struct gup_benchmark)
-#define GUP_BENCHMARK		_IOWR('g', 3, struct gup_benchmark)
+#define GUP_FAST_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 2, struct gup_benchmark)
+#define GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 3, struct gup_benchmark)
+#define GUP_BENCHMARK		_IOWR('g', 4, struct gup_benchmark)
 
 struct gup_benchmark {
 	__u64 get_delta_usec;
@@ -53,6 +54,11 @@ static int __gup_benchmark_ioctl(unsigned int cmd,
 			nr = get_user_pages_fast(addr, nr, gup->flags & 1,
 						 pages + i);
 			break;
+		case GUP_FAST_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK:
+			nr = get_user_pages_fast(addr, nr,
+						 (gup->flags & 1) | FOLL_LONGTERM,
+						 pages + i);
+			break;
 		case GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK:
 			nr = get_user_pages(addr, nr,
 					    (gup->flags & 1) | FOLL_LONGTERM,
@@ -96,6 +102,7 @@ static long gup_benchmark_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd,
 
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case GUP_FAST_BENCHMARK:
+	case GUP_FAST_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK:
 	case GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK:
 	case GUP_BENCHMARK:
 		break;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c
index c0534e2..ade8acb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c
@@ -15,8 +15,9 @@
 #define PAGE_SIZE sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE)
 
 #define GUP_FAST_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 1, struct gup_benchmark)
-#define GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 2, struct gup_benchmark)
-#define GUP_BENCHMARK		_IOWR('g', 3, struct gup_benchmark)
+#define GUP_FAST_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 2, struct gup_benchmark)
+#define GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK	_IOWR('g', 3, struct gup_benchmark)
+#define GUP_BENCHMARK		_IOWR('g', 4, struct gup_benchmark)
 
 struct gup_benchmark {
 	__u64 get_delta_usec;
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	char *file = "/dev/zero";
 	char *p;
 
-	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "m:r:n:f:tTLUSH")) != -1) {
+	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "m:r:n:f:tTlLUSH")) != -1) {
 		switch (opt) {
 		case 'm':
 			size = atoi(optarg) * MB;
@@ -54,6 +55,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		case 'T':
 			thp = 0;
 			break;
+		case 'l':
+			cmd = GUP_FAST_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK;
+			break;
 		case 'L':
 			cmd = GUP_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK;
 			break;
-- 
2.7.5


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-05  9:10 [PATCHv3 1/2] mm/gup: fix omission of check on FOLL_LONGTERM in get_user_pages_fast() Pingfan Liu
2019-06-05  9:10 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] mm/gup: rename nr as nr_pinned " Pingfan Liu
2019-06-05 21:49 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] mm/gup: fix omission of check on FOLL_LONGTERM " Andrew Morton
2019-06-06  2:19   ` Pingfan Liu
2019-06-06 21:17     ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07  6:10       ` Pingfan Liu
2019-06-11 12:29         ` Pingfan Liu [this message]
2019-06-11 13:52           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 19:49             ` John Hubbard
2019-06-11 16:47           ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-12 14:10             ` Pingfan Liu
2019-06-11 16:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-11 16:29   ` Weiny, Ira
2019-06-12 13:54     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-06-12 23:50       ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-13 10:48         ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611122935.GA9919@dhcp-128-55.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).