linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:36:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701093640.GA17349@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190701085144.GJ6376@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:51:44AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Yeah, we do not allow to offline multi zone (node) ranges so the current
> code seems to be over engineered.
> 
> Anyway, I am wondering why do we have to strictly check for already
> removed nodes links. Is the sysfs code going to complain we we try to
> remove again?

No, sysfs will silently "fail" if the symlink has already been removed.
At least that is what I saw last time I played with it.

I guess the question is what if sysfs handling changes in the future
and starts dropping warnings when trying to remove a symlink is not there.
Maybe that is unlikely to happen?

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-01  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27 11:11 [PATCH v3 00/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Factor out memory block devicehandling David Hildenbrand
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Simplify and fix check_hotplug_memory_range() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-30 17:53   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-06-10 16:46   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-07-01  7:42   ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] s390x/mm: Fail when an altmap is used for arch_add_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-06-10 17:07   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-07-01  7:43   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-01 12:46     ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-15 10:51       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-19  6:45         ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] s390x/mm: Implement arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-07-01  7:45   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-01 12:47     ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-15 10:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Add temporary arch_remove_memory() implementation David Hildenbrand
2019-06-03 21:41   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-04  6:56     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-04 17:36       ` Robin Murphy
2019-06-04 17:51         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-01 12:48   ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] drivers/base/memory: Pass a block_id to init_memory_block() David Hildenbrand
2019-06-03 21:49   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-04  6:56     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-01  7:56   ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Allow arch_remove_pages() without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE David Hildenbrand
2019-05-30 17:56   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-06-03 22:15   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-04  6:59     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-04  8:31       ` Wei Yang
2019-06-04  9:00         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-01  8:01   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-01 12:51     ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-15 10:54       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-19  6:06         ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Create memory block devices after arch_add_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-30 21:07   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-06-04 21:42   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-05  8:58     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-05 10:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-05 21:22         ` Wei Yang
2019-06-05 21:50           ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-01  8:14   ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop MHP_MEMBLOCK_API David Hildenbrand
2019-06-04 21:47   ` Wei Yang
2019-07-01  8:15   ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-06-04 22:07   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-05  9:00     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-01  8:41   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-15 10:58     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail David Hildenbrand
2019-06-05 21:21   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-10 16:56   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-07-01  8:51   ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-01  9:36     ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2019-07-01 10:27       ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-15 11:10         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-16  8:46           ` Oscar Salvador
2019-07-16 11:08             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-16 11:09             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-19  6:05           ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove "zone" parameter from sparse_remove_one_section David Hildenbrand
2019-06-05 21:21   ` Wei Yang
2019-06-10 16:58   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-07-01  8:52   ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Factor out memory block devicehandling Wei Yang
2019-06-03 21:40   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190701093640.GA17349@linux \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).