From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/ioremap: Probe platform for p4d huge map support
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:06:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190702160630.25de5558e9fe2d7d845f3472@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561699231-20991-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:50:31 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
> Finishing up what the commit c2febafc67734a ("mm: convert generic code to
> 5-level paging") started out while levelling up P4D huge mapping support
> at par with PUD and PMD. A new arch call back arch_ioremap_p4d_supported()
> is being added which just maintains status quo (P4D huge map not supported)
> on x86, arm64 and powerpc.
Does this have any runtime effects? If so, what are they and why? If
not, what's the actual point?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-02 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 5:20 [PATCH V2] mm/ioremap: Probe platform for p4d huge map support Anshuman Khandual
2019-07-02 23:06 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-07-04 15:26 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-07-12 7:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-12 8:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-12 9:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190702160630.25de5558e9fe2d7d845f3472@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).