[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 42/45] mm/kmemleak.c: fix check for softirq context

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 42/45] mm/kmemleak.c: fix check for softirq context

[Sasha Levin]

From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 6ef9056952532c3b746de46aa10d45b4d7797bd8 ]

in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq
context.  It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are
falsely stamped with "softirq" comm.  The correct predicate is
in_serving_softirq().

If user does cat from /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak previously they would
see this, which is clearly wrong, this is system call context (see the
comm):

unreferenced object 0xffff88805bd661c0 (size 64):
  comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294942959 (age 12.400s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
    [<0000000007dcb30c>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x13d/0x280 mm/slab.c:3553
    [<00000000969722b7>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
    [<00000000969722b7>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:742 [inline]
    [<00000000969722b7>] ip_mc_add1_src net/ipv4/igmp.c:1961 [inline]
    [<00000000969722b7>] ip_mc_add_src+0x36b/0x400 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2085
    [<00000000a4134b5f>] ip_mc_msfilter+0x22d/0x310 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2475
    [<00000000d20248ad>] do_ip_setsockopt.isra.0+0x19fe/0x1c00 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:957
    [<000000003d367be7>] ip_setsockopt+0x3b/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1246
    [<000000003c7c76af>] udp_setsockopt+0x4e/0x90 net/ipv4/udp.c:2616
    [<000000000c1aeb23>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x3e/0x50 net/core/sock.c:3130
    [<000000000157b92b>] __sys_setsockopt+0x9e/0x120 net/socket.c:2078
    [<00000000a9f3d058>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2089 [inline]
    [<00000000a9f3d058>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2086 [inline]
    [<00000000a9f3d058>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x26/0x30 net/socket.c:2086
    [<000000001b8da885>] do_syscall_64+0x7c/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
    [<00000000ba770c62>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

now they will see this:

unreferenced object 0xffff88805413c800 (size 64):
  comm "syz-executor.4", pid 8960, jiffies 4294994003 (age 14.350s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 7a 8a 57 80 88 ff ff e0 00 00 01 00 00 00 00  .z.W............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
    [<00000000c5d3be64>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x13d/0x280 mm/slab.c:3553
    [<0000000023865be2>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
    [<0000000023865be2>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:742 [inline]
    [<0000000023865be2>] ip_mc_add1_src net/ipv4/igmp.c:1961 [inline]
    [<0000000023865be2>] ip_mc_add_src+0x36b/0x400 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2085
    [<000000003029a9d4>] ip_mc_msfilter+0x22d/0x310 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2475
    [<00000000ccd0a87c>] do_ip_setsockopt.isra.0+0x19fe/0x1c00 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:957
    [<00000000a85a3785>] ip_setsockopt+0x3b/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1246
    [<00000000ec13c18d>] udp_setsockopt+0x4e/0x90 net/ipv4/udp.c:2616
    [<0000000052d748e3>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x3e/0x50 net/core/sock.c:3130
    [<00000000512f1014>] __sys_setsockopt+0x9e/0x120 net/socket.c:2078
    [<00000000181758bc>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2089 [inline]
    [<00000000181758bc>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2086 [inline]
    [<00000000181758bc>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x26/0x30 net/socket.c:2086
    [<00000000d4b73623>] do_syscall_64+0x7c/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
    [<00000000c1098bec>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517171507.96046-1-dvyukov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 9e66449ed91f..d05133b37b17 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size,
 	if (in_irq()) {
 		object->pid = 0;
 		strncpy(object->comm, "hardirq", sizeof(object->comm));
-	} else if (in_softirq()) {
+	} else if (in_serving_softirq()) {
 		object->pid = 0;
 		strncpy(object->comm, "softirq", sizeof(object->comm));
 	} else {
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 44/45] mm/mmu_notifier: use hlist_add_head_rcu()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit 543bdb2d825fe2400d6e951f1786d92139a16931 ]

Make mmu_notifier_register() safer by issuing a memory barrier before
registering a new notifier.  This fixes a theoretical bug on weakly
ordered CPUs.  For example, take this simplified use of notifiers by a
driver:

	my_struct->mn.ops = &my_ops; /* (1) */
	mmu_notifier_register(&my_struct->mn, mm)
		...
		hlist_add_head(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifiers); /* (2) */
		...

Once mmu_notifier_register() releases the mm locks, another thread can
invalidate a range:

	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
		...
		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, &mm->mmu_notifiers, hlist) {
			if (mn->ops->invalidate_range)

The read side relies on the data dependency between mn and ops to ensure
that the pointer is properly initialized.  But the write side doesn't have
any dependency between (1) and (2), so they could be reordered and the
readers could dereference an invalid mn->ops.  mmu_notifier_register()
does take all the mm locks before adding to the hlist, but those have
acquire semantics which isn't sufficient.

By calling hlist_add_head_rcu() instead of hlist_add_head() we update the
hlist using a store-release, ensuring that readers see prior
initialization of my_struct.  This situation is better illustated by
litmus test MP+onceassign+derefonce.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190502133532.24981-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com
Fixes: cddb8a5c14aa ("mmu-notifiers: core")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 mm/mmu_notifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index f4259e496f83..7a66e37efb4d 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	 * thanks to mm_take_all_locks().
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
-	hlist_add_head(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list);
+	hlist_add_head_rcu(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list);
 	spin_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
 
 	mm_drop_all_locks(mm);
-- 
2.20.1