linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
	xishi.qiuxishi@alibaba-inc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix hugetlb page migration/fault race causing SIGBUS
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:46:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190811234614.GZ17747@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809151718.d285cd1f6d0f1cf02cb93dc8@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:46:33 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> > Maybe we should introduce the Fixes-no-stable: tag.  That should get
>> > their attention.
>>
>> No please, Fixes shouldn't be really tight to any stable tree rules. It
>> is a very useful indication of which commit has introduced bug/problem
>> or whatever that the patch follows up to. We in Suse are using this tag
>> to evaluate potential fixes as the stable is not reliable. We could live
>> with Fixes-no-stable or whatever other name but does it really makes
>> sense to complicate the existing state when stable maintainers are doing
>> whatever they want anyway? Does a tag like that force AI from selecting
>> a patch? I am not really convinced.
>
>It should work if we ask stable trees maintainers not to backport
>such patches.
>
>Sasha, please don't backport patches which are marked Fixes-no-stable:
>and which lack a cc:stable tag.

I'll add it to my filter, thank you!

--
Thanks,
Sasha


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-11 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-08  0:05 [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix hugetlb page migration/fault race causing SIGBUS Mike Kravetz
2019-08-08  3:36 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2019-08-08  7:46 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-08  7:47   ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-08 16:55     ` Mike Kravetz
2019-08-08 18:53       ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-08 23:39         ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-09  6:46           ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-09 22:17             ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-11 23:46               ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-08-12  8:45                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-12 13:14                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-12 13:22                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-12 15:33                       ` Sasha Levin
2019-08-12 16:09                         ` Qian Cai
2019-08-12 21:37                         ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-13  8:43                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-08  2:24 裘稀石(稀石)
2019-08-08  2:44 ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190811234614.GZ17747@sasha-vm \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=xishi.qiuxishi@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).