From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B01BC3A589 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20F8206C1 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="KcW7SJTC" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E20F8206C1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 829776B0007; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7D8A06B0008; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:00:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6A0146B000A; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:00:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0101.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.101]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B136B0007 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A4E44181AC9AE for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:00:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75826485756.14.knot56_22a73b73edf03 X-HE-Tag: knot56_22a73b73edf03 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6108 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com (mail-qk1-f193.google.com [209.85.222.193]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 201so3391496qkm.9 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ae7oLtYinKvgCP13tnVSH7l6maTQr55HBH5L3FO3DiI=; b=KcW7SJTCvYMKEBr6ZA7ZBCVrwhTBhrxBAzKDZCEQfgTQ1UAU1/yBqq/rXTp4rQSuMJ IO3knBqpn2AdA04HAixLj3yCozsg1UAo/yGd5mtobT9P7ox1cF3Az+gzxvSHjtS74RUp WvaqkLapT2Ubt9ToChKBB0qe0ngW33kWeP+H8aeA2AYYZE14PPhIZ/S3lqmaw6o7OQOc +NqXbwj2Kf5YIU09s9BqFI5Fx6K9MIW9Pox2mvr2sLTsxwPMikvBFCp/EFlqT78uepMz rSFX7X+6jzzyCjzCiQ0A93GLozvhXSdE0CeSM6/pkHRgn74yKYamKJEUnwca6vz4+PPL iGog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ae7oLtYinKvgCP13tnVSH7l6maTQr55HBH5L3FO3DiI=; b=lcZRimv6A+qEPlbZS+I3LxkcH+BMMgcmzxEAesI92Y3asQnC+8z+P+kxwugnqw0O5Y 9P7BI8ix1iBt89Xji5lovcbX2HvDXrDcZ5RhV2uTdydAQdf5qUO9dekSyRT/0cXiLp8n LE1deCQBUieKMwHGlWX2v7J7xY3+6l0YXdw4oJ04j3wYjtG7dShaUx2v4KizWXnjtLN7 6auhpDXslX/hdSIVNdULvnHAWf1BM8CR8W7F5M3CluMjhi23O8ABIGMbG6MbKuPUWAvd zA4c7ZgX/p1G9MGPnmF2adDsXMuU6hW+VBTlXnFOkgQknv++krCdYOAlVng6WXBv2UiX cuFg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkVe5frnORxClHxxsr1oM1/yBgXjS2bYueZPbQwfwF4NKJzJfH QCwQNoM69Cj84nT4n4wFSvzyIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxI9OS6AUw/7wEeJomE7hGeWSroP0/H9Q9E+ZoJynGDvtwyvcA9yHhjJMm3q3CVcLQLGNODw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa57:: with SMTP id t84mr6562963qke.34.1565917237376; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-55-100.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.55.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15sm2084806qtr.88.2019.08.15.18.00.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyQbc-0002v2-3C; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 22:00:36 -0300 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 22:00:36 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Michal Hocko , Feng Tang , Randy Dunlap , Kees Cook , Masahiro Yamada , Peter Zijlstra , Intel Graphics Development , Jann Horn , LKML , DRI Development , Linux MM , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , David Rientjes , Wei Wang , Daniel Vetter , Andrew Morton , Andy Shevchenko , Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end() Message-ID: <20190816010036.GA9915@ziepe.ca> References: <20190815155950.GN9477@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190815165631.GK21596@ziepe.ca> <20190815174207.GR9477@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190815182448.GP21596@ziepe.ca> <20190815190525.GS9477@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190815191810.GR21596@ziepe.ca> <20190815193526.GT9477@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190815202721.GV21596@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:49:31PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:27 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:16:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > So if someone can explain to me how that works with lockdep I can of > > > course implement it. But afaics that doesn't exist (I tried to explain > > > that somewhere else already), and I'm no really looking forward to > > > hacking also on lockdep for this little series. > > > > Hmm, kind of looks like it is done by calling preempt_disable() > > Yup. That was v1, then came the suggestion that disabling preemption > is maybe not the best thing (the oom reaper could still run for a long > time comparatively, if it's cleaning out gigabytes of process memory > or what not, hence this dedicated debug infrastructure). Oh, I'm coming in late, sorry Anyhow, I was thinking since we agreed this can trigger on some CONFIG_DEBUG flag, something like /* This is a sleepable region, but use preempt_disable to get debugging * for calls that are not allowed to block for OOM [.. insert * Michal's explanation.. ] */ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP) && !mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range)) preempt_disable(); ops->invalidate_range_start(); And I have also been idly mulling doing something like if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS) && rand && mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range)) { range->flags = 0 if (!ops->invalidate_range_start(range)) continue // Failed, try again as blockable range->flags = MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE } ops->invalidate_range_start(range); Which would give coverage for this corner case without forcing OOM. Jason