From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8041C49ED6 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778502053B for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:44:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 778502053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 06D4D6B000D; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:44:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 01E506B000E; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:44:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E2AAE6B0010; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:44:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0058.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.58]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF14E6B000D for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:44:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 63E5A8243770 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:44:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75922911750.23.back08_dd3308ff9444 X-HE-Tag: back08_dd3308ff9444 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4688 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf31.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8BEipBP140002 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:44:54 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uy0caxadf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:44:52 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:42:38 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:42:36 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8BEgZPu53477490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:42:35 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FECAE059; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:42:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737ADAE056; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:42:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.207.74]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:42:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:42:31 +0100 From: Mike Rapoport To: Cao jin Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: fix typo in memblock doc References: <20190911030856.18010-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190911030856.18010-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19091114-0016-0000-0000-000002AA0E49 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19091114-0017-0000-0000-0000330A9B22 Message-Id: <20190911144230.GB6429@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-11_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909110138 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:08:56AM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > elaboarte -> elaborate > architecure -> architecture > compltes -> completes > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > --- > mm/memblock.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 7d4f61ae666a..0d0f92003d18 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@ > * Note, that both API variants use implict assumptions about allowed > * memory ranges and the fallback methods. Consult the documentation > * of :c:func:`memblock_alloc_internal` and > - * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaboarte > + * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaborate While on it, could you please replace the :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` construct with memblock_alloc_range_nid()? And that would be really great to see all the :c:func:`foo` changed to foo(). > * description. > * > * As the system boot progresses, the architecture specific > * :c:func:`mem_init` function frees all the memory to the buddy page > * allocator. > * > - * Unless an architecure enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the > + * Unless an architecture enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the > * memblock data structures will be discarded after the system > - * initialization compltes. > + * initialization completes. > */ > > #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES > -- > 2.21.0 > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.