From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm, page_owner: decouple freeing stack trace from debug_pagealloc
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:31:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191001123151.qmv4ist3enq65uha@box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569932788.5576.247.camel@lca.pw>
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 08:26:28AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 14:51 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:07:44AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 10/1/19 1:49 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Sep 30, 2019, at 5:43 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, my use case is shipping production kernels with CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER
> > > > > and CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enabled, and instructing users to boot-time
> > > > > enable only for troubleshooting a crash or memory leak, without a need
> > > > > to install a debug kernel. Things like static keys and page_ext
> > > > > allocations makes this possible without CPU and memory overhead when not
> > > > > boot-time enabled. I don't know too much about KASAN internals, but I
> > > > > assume it's not possible to use it that way on production kernels yet?
> > > >
> > > > In that case, why can’t users just simply enable page_owner=on and
> > > > debug_pagealloc=on for troubleshooting? The later makes the kernel
> > > > slower, but I am not sure if it is worth optimization by adding a new
> > > > parameter. There have already been quite a few MM-related kernel
> > > > parameters that could tidy up a bit in the future.
> > >
> > > They can do that and it was intention, yes. The extra parameter was
> > > requested by Kirill, so I'll defer the answer to him :)
> >
> > DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is much more intrusive debug option. Not all architectures
> > support it in an efficient way. Some require hibernation.
> >
> > I don't see a reason to tie these two option together.
>
> Make sense. How about page_owner=on will have page_owner_free=on by default?
> That way we don't need the extra parameter.
It's 0.1% of system memory. Does it matter for a debug option? I don't know.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-01 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 12:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] followups to debug_pagealloc improvements through page_owner Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-30 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm, page_owner: fix off-by-one error in __set_page_owner_handle() Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-30 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm, page_owner: decouple freeing stack trace from debug_pagealloc Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-30 12:49 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-30 21:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-30 23:49 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 8:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 11:51 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-01 12:26 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 12:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2019-10-01 12:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 12:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 13:18 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-01 14:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-10-01 11:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-30 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm, page_owner: rename flag indicating that page is allocated Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-30 12:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191001123151.qmv4ist3enq65uha@box \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).