From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D837EECE58B for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E072190F for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A7E072190F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 3DA258E0005; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:32:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 389EF8E0001; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:32:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2A0DF8E0005; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:32:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0177.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0825B8E0001 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:32:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2596D9A for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:32:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75995305176.09.coat15_6cdb887359762 X-HE-Tag: coat15_6cdb887359762 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4407 Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org (inca-roads.misterjones.org [213.251.177.50]) by imf35.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why) by cheepnis.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iFIGL-00060M-7n; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:32:21 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:32:19 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Will Deacon Cc: Jia He , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Matthew Wilcox , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Punit Agrawal , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , hejianet@gmail.com, Kaly Xin Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] arm64: mm: implement arch_faults_on_old_pte() on arm64 Message-ID: <20191001143219.018281be@why> In-Reply-To: <20191001125031.7ddm5dlwss6m3dth@willie-the-truck> References: <20190930015740.84362-1-justin.he@arm.com> <20190930015740.84362-3-justin.he@arm.com> <20191001125031.7ddm5dlwss6m3dth@willie-the-truck> Organization: Approximate X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: will@kernel.org, justin.he@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, willy@infradead.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, punitagrawal@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hejianet@gmail.com, Kaly.Xin@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:50:32 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:57:39AM +0800, Jia He wrote: > > On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying fromuser will fail because > > the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we always end up with zeroed > > page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. we don't always have a > > hardware-managed access flag on arm64. > > > > Hence implement arch_faults_on_old_pte on arm64 to indicate that it might > > cause page fault when accessing old pte. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jia He > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > index 7576df00eb50..e96fb82f62de 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > @@ -885,6 +885,20 @@ static inline void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > #define phys_to_ttbr(addr) (addr) > > #endif > > > > +/* > > + * On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying from user will fail because > > + * the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we always end up with zeroed > > + * page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. We don't always have a > > + * hardware-managed access flag on arm64. > > + */ > > +static inline bool arch_faults_on_old_pte(void) > > +{ > > + WARN_ON(preemptible()); > > + > > + return !cpu_has_hw_af(); > > +} > > Does this work correctly in a KVM guest? (i.e. is the MMFR sanitised in that > case, despite not being the case on the host?) Yup, all the 64bit MMFRs are trapped (HCR_EL2.TID3 is set for an AArch64 guest), and we return the sanitised version. But that's an interesting remark: we're now trading an extra fault on CPUs that do not support HWAFDBS for a guaranteed trap for each and every guest under the sun that will hit the COW path... My gut feeling is that this is going to be pretty visible. Jia, do you have any numbers for this kind of behaviour? Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.