From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: "Thomas Hellström (VMware)" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
"Thomas Hellstrom" <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>,
"Minchan Kim" <minchan@kernel.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Huang Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: Remove BUG_ON mmap_sem not held from xxx_trans_huge_lock()
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:02:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003110232.mltuantcw5pcrybo@box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002134730.40985-2-thomas_os@shipmail.org>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:47:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
>
> The caller needs to make sure that the vma is not torn down during the
> lock operation and can also use the i_mmap_rwsem for file-backed vmas.
> Remove the BUG_ON. We could, as an alternative, add a test that either
> vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem or vma->vm_file->f_mapping->i_mmap_rwsem are held.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
The patch looks good to me:
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
But I looked at usage at pagewalk.c and it is inconsitent. The walker
takes ptl before calling ->pud_entry(), but not for ->pmd_entry().
It should be fixed: do not take the lock before ->pud_entry(). The
callback must take care of it.
Looks like we have single ->pud_entry() implementation the whole kernel.
It should be trivial to fix.
Could you do this?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 13:47 [PATCH v3 0/7] Emulated coherent graphics memory take 2 Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: Remove BUG_ON mmap_sem not held from xxx_trans_huge_lock() Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-03 11:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2019-10-03 11:32 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: Add a walk_page_mapping() function to the pagewalk code Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-03 11:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-03 11:32 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-04 12:37 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-04 12:58 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-04 13:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-02 18:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-02 19:09 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 20:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-03 7:56 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-10-03 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-03 18:03 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-03 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/vmwgfx: Implement an infrastructure for write-coherent resources Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/vmwgfx: Use an RBtree instead of linked list for MOB resources Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/vmwgfx: Implement an infrastructure for read-coherent resources Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-10-02 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/vmwgfx: Add surface dirty-tracking callbacks Thomas Hellström (VMware)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191003110232.mltuantcw5pcrybo@box \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).