linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add a reason for reserved pages in has_unmovable_pages()
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:41:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004144150.GO9578@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570197360.5576.275.camel@lca.pw>

On Fri 04-10-19 09:56:00, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 15:38 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 04-10-19 09:30:39, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 15:07 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Fri 04-10-19 08:56:16, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > It might be a good time to rethink if it is really a good idea to dump_page()
> > > > > at all inside has_unmovable_pages(). As it is right now, it is a a potential
> > > > > deadlock between console vs memory offline. More details are in this thread,
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1568817579.5576.172.camel@lca.pw/
> > > > 
> > > > Huh. That would imply we cannot do any printk from that path, no?
> > > 
> > > Yes, or use something like printk_deferred()
> > 
> > This is just insane. The hotplug code is in no way special wrt printk.
> > It is never called from the printk code AFAIK and thus there is no real
> > reason why this particular code should be any special. Not to mention
> > it calls printk indirectly from a code that is shared with other code
> > paths.
> 
> Basically, printk() while holding the zone_lock will be problematic as console
> is doing the opposite as it always needs to allocate some memory. Then, it will
> always find some way to form this chain,
> 
> console_lock -> * -> zone_lock.

So this is not as much a hotplug specific problem but zone->lock ->
printk -> alloc chain that is a problem, right? Who is doing an
allocation from this atomic context? I do not see any atomic allocation
in kernel/printk/printk.c.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-04 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-03  8:10 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add a reason for reserved pages in has_unmovable_pages() Anshuman Khandual
2019-10-03  9:05 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-03  9:32   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-10-03  9:53     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-10-03 11:19     ` Qian Cai
2019-10-03 11:32       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-10-03 11:50         ` Qian Cai
2019-10-03 12:02           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-10-03 12:14             ` Qian Cai
2019-10-04  8:25               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-14  8:19                 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-14  8:30                   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-14  9:10                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-14 10:23                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-01-14 11:03                       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-14 11:32                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-14 12:04                         ` [PATCH] mm, debug: always print flags in dump_page() Vlastimil Babka
2020-01-14 13:35                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-14 18:22                         ` [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add a reason for reserved pages in has_unmovable_pages() Ralph Campbell
2019-10-04 10:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-04 11:44   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-10-04 12:56     ` Qian Cai
2019-10-04 13:07       ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-04 13:30         ` Qian Cai
2019-10-04 13:38           ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-04 13:56             ` Qian Cai
2019-10-04 14:41               ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-10-05 21:22                 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-05 22:38                   ` Qian Cai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191004144150.GO9578@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).