From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, walken@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] x86/mm, pat: convert pat tree to generic interval tree
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:33:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007153339.GA95072@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191003201858.11666-12-dave@stgolabs.net>
* Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> With some considerations, the custom pat_rbtree implementation can be
> simplified to use most of the generic interval_tree machinery.
>
> o The tree inorder traversal can slightly differ when there are key
> ('start') collisions in the tree due to one going left and another right.
> This, however, only affects the output of debugfs' pat_memtype_list file.
>
> o Generic interval trees are now semi open [a,b), which suits well with
> what pat wants.
>
> o Erasing logic must remain untouched as well.
>
> In order for the types to remain u64, the 'memtype_interval' calls are
> introduced, as opposed to simply using struct interval_tree.
>
> In addition, pat tree might potentially also benefit by the fast overlap
> detection for the insertion case when looking up the first overlapping node
> in the tree.
>
> Finally, I've tested this on various servers, via sanity warnings, running
> side by side with the current version and so far see no differences in the
> returned pointer node when doing memtype_rb_lowest_match() lookups.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 22 +++----
> arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c | 151 ++++++++++-------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
I suppose this will be carried in -mm?
If so and if this patch is regression free, then:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-03 20:18 [PATCH -next 00/11] lib/interval-tree: move to half closed intervals Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: introduce vma_interval_tree_foreach_stab() Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] lib/interval-tree: add an equivalent tree with [a,b) intervals Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 11:02 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_it to half closed intervals Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 6:54 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-04 11:36 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-04 12:39 ` Christian König
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm: convert drm_mm_interval_tree " Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] IB/hfi1: convert __mmu_int_rb " Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 11:50 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-04 19:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] IB,usnic: convert usnic_uiom_interval_tree " Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] vhost: convert vhost_umem_interval_tree " Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 12:10 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-04 19:44 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-10 5:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: convert vma_interval_tree " Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-04 12:30 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] lib/interval-tree: convert interval_tree " Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 22:50 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 6:57 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-04 7:20 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-10-08 16:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] lib: drop interval_tree_generic.h Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/mm, pat: convert pat tree to generic interval tree Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-07 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-10-21 23:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-03 20:32 ` [PATCH -next 00/11] lib/interval-tree: move to half closed intervals Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-03 21:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 12:43 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-04 0:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-04 2:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 13:15 ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-10-04 16:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-04 19:35 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-10-04 17:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191007153339.GA95072@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).