From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5942CA9EC9 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54212080F for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="XVxuk3+V" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A54212080F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5A8086B0005; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:21:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 558A86B0006; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:21:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 46F8F6B0007; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:21:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329F56B0005 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:21:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0099B181AC1F5 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76120168110.12.berry96_624c74ca9c35b X-HE-Tag: berry96_624c74ca9c35b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5214 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA4NJYTA045505; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=cMrpcm51otgeL8Re+g3qAXBEuLWi0XsR5qH01HB4h+U=; b=XVxuk3+VkgptV3dSxv2tl03MO7LxC14L6bl/oJDyrVamwZjGvtogHsnOVfHw0FbHieqg JAB1nttbJCoh7zAF90B4zlj6MpADbK2JevENtY0Ad+JsnQLWGDv+SMGGMaflEBOYe5S3 chzygh9kvnrEth7oTt5sDYGFJsJLd/YckOB8OnD3UV1FV7kLQSJhL0jxJkLHTkwg6GJR tpIgNTakvi6HnWH88pka1TjZ4gxvDfflEDqKqrWMZmm5H8vY6JMDyLw+yk0QJi6SScoe +z6NSS+eiu8+nzIXkT/PmJJogzqtCP/1TLcz+DM55UkxFGgjs8fvSJTzPM+hmriGfD5X fQ== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2w12er2fsr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:21:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA4NJVC0102226; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:12 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2w1kxn7qv2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:21:12 +0000 Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id xA4NLCTF020486; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:21:12 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 15:21:11 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:21:10 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/28] xfs: Improve metadata buffer reclaim accountability Message-ID: <20191104232110.GS4153244@magnolia> References: <20191031234618.15403-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20191031234618.15403-5-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191031234618.15403-5-david@fromorbit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9431 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=2 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=836 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040221 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9431 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=921 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040222 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:45:54AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > The buffer cache shrinker frees more than just the xfs_buf slab > objects - it also frees the pages attached to the buffers. Make sure > the memory reclaim code accounts for this memory being freed > correctly, similar to how the inode shrinker accounts for pages > freed from the page cache due to mapping invalidation. > > We also need to make sure that the mm subsystem knows these are > reclaimable objects. We provide the memory reclaim subsystem with a > a shrinker to reclaim xfs_bufs, so we should really mark the slab > that way. > > We also have a lot of xfs_bufs in a busy system, spread them around > like we do inodes. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > index 1e63dd3d1257..d34e5d2edacd 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c > @@ -324,6 +324,9 @@ xfs_buf_free( > > __free_page(page); > } > + if (current->reclaim_state) > + current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += > + bp->b_page_count; > } else if (bp->b_flags & _XBF_KMEM) > kmem_free(bp->b_addr); > _xfs_buf_free_pages(bp); > @@ -2061,7 +2064,8 @@ int __init > xfs_buf_init(void) > { > xfs_buf_zone = kmem_zone_init_flags(sizeof(xfs_buf_t), "xfs_buf", > - KM_ZONE_HWALIGN, NULL); > + KM_ZONE_HWALIGN | KM_ZONE_SPREAD | KM_ZONE_RECLAIM, As discussed on the previous iteration of this series, I'd like to capture the reasons for adding KM_ZONE_SPREAD as a separate patch. --D > + NULL); > if (!xfs_buf_zone) > goto out; > > -- > 2.24.0.rc0 >