From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DBBCA9ED9 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355FF214D8 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:06:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 355FF214D8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=clip-os.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C2ED16B0003; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:06:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BDF276B0006; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:06:02 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B1B126B0007; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:06:02 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0249.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.249]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C56A6B0003 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:06:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BECD824999B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:06:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76121490564.01.corn58_177e942df2745 X-HE-Tag: corn58_177e942df2745 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2046 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandi.net (laubervilliers-658-1-215-187.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.246.187]) (Authenticated sender: thibaut.sautereau@clip-os.org) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CD66240008; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:05:54 +0100 From: Thibaut Sautereau To: Eric Dumazet Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Laura Abbott , Kees Cook , Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , clipos@ssi.gouv.fr Subject: Re: Double free of struct sk_buff reported by SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS with init_on_free Message-ID: <20191105080554.GA1006@gandi.net> References: <20191104170303.GA50361@gandi.net> <719eebd3-259d-8beb-025a-f2d17c632711@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <719eebd3-259d-8beb-025a-f2d17c632711@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.026610, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 09:33:18AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On 11/4/19 9:03 AM, Thibaut Sautereau wrote: > > > > We first encountered this issue under huge network traffic (system image > > download), and I was able to reproduce by simply sending a big packet > > with `ping -s 65507 `, which crashes the kernel every single time. > > > > Since you have a repro, could you start a bisection ? >From my previous email: "Bisection points to the following commit: 1b7e816fc80e ("mm: slub: Fix slab walking for init_on_free"), and indeed the BUG is not triggered when init_on_free is disabled." Or are you meaning something else? -- Thibaut Sautereau CLIP OS developer