linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction: Disable compact_unevictable_allowed on RT
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:22:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116102239.m2trw3cvosn7q5a5@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cf4507b-0632-34e6-5985-df933559af9f@suse.cz>

On 2020-01-15 23:04:19 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/15/2020 5:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Since commit
> >     5bbe3547aa3ba ("mm: allow compaction of unevictable pages")
> > 
> > it is allowed to examine mlocked pages and compact them by default.
> > On -RT even minor pagefaults are problematic because it may take a few
> > 100us to resolve them and until then the task is blocked.
> 
> Fine, this makes sense on RT I guess. There might be some trade-off for
> high-order allocation latencies though. We could perhaps migrate such mlocked
> pages to pages allocated without __GFP_MOVABLE during the mlock() to at least
> somewhat prevent them being scattered all over the zones. For MCL_FUTURE,
> allocate them as unmovable from the beginning. But that can wait until issues
> are reported.
> I assume you have similar solution for NUMA balancing and whatever else can
> cause minor faults?

I've found this one while testing. Could you please point to the NUMA
balancing that might be an issue?

> > Make compact_unevictable_allowed = 0 default and remove it from /proc on
> > RT.
> 
> Removing it is maybe going too far in terms of RT kernel differences confusing
> users? Change the default sure, perhaps making it read-only, but removing?

Okay. I will make it RO then. 

> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190710144138.qyn4tuttdq6h7kqx@linutronix.de/
> 
> In any case the sysctl Documentation/ should be updated? And perhaps also the
> mlock manpage as you noted in the older thread above?

Sure. Let me add the sysctl documentation to this patch and then I will
look into the manpage.

> Thanks,
> Vlastimil

Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 16:10 [PATCH] mm/compaction: Disable compact_unevictable_allowed on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-01-15 22:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-01-16 10:22   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2020-03-02 17:35   ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-02 21:25     ` Andrew Morton
2020-03-03 17:59       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-03 20:20         ` [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?mm/compaction:=20Really=20limit=20compact?= =?UTF-8?q?=5Funevictable=5Fallowed=20to=200=E2=80=A61?= Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-03 20:22           ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] mm/compaction: Disable compact_unevictable_allowed on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-03 23:56             ` Andrew Morton
2020-03-04  8:19               ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-04  9:27                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-19 16:39               ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-19 16:49                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-19 16:55                   ` [PATCH 2/2 v5] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-04  8:18             ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-04  9:25               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-03-04  9:11             ` Mel Gorman
2020-03-04  8:12           ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/compaction: Really limit compact_unevictable_allowed to 0…1 Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200116102239.m2trw3cvosn7q5a5@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).