From: "Li Xinhai" <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, mhocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/mempolicy,hugetlb: Checking hstate for hugetlbfs page in vma_migratable
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:11:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200118111121432688303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200117111629898234212@gmail.com
On 2020-01-17 at 11:16 Li Xinhai wrote:
>On 2020-01-16 at 23:38 Li Xinhai wrote:
>>On 2020-01-16 at 23:18 Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>On Thu 16-01-20 21:50:34, Li Xinhai wrote:
>>>> On 2020-01-16 at 17:56 Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> >On Thu 16-01-20 04:11:25, Li Xinhai wrote:
>>>> >> Checking hstate at early phase when isolating page, instead of during
>>>> >> unmap and move phase, to avoid useless isolation.
>>>> >
>>>> >Could you be more specific what you mean by isolation and why does it
>>>> >matter? The patch description should really explain _why_ the change is
>>>> >needed or desirable.
>>>>
>>>> The changelog can be improved:
>>>>
>>>> vma_migratable() is called to check if pages in vma can be migrated
>>>> before go ahead to isolate, unmap and move pages. For hugetlb pages,
>>>> hugepage_migration_supported(struct hstate *h) is one factor which
>>>> decide if migration is supported. In current code, this function is called
>>>> from unmap_and_move_huge_page(), after isolating page has
>>>> completed.
>>>> This patch checks hstate from vma_migratable() and avoids isolating pages
>>>> which are not supported.
>>>
>>>This still explains what but not why this is relevant. If by isolating
>>>pages you mean isolate_lru_page then this really a noop for hugetlb
>>>pages. Or do I still misread your changelog?
>>
>>I mean isolate_huge_page will queue pages for moving, and
>>unmap_and_move_huge_page will call
>>hugepage_migration_supported then refuse moving.
>>
>
>Forgot to mention that this patch has no relevant with this one
>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11331639/,
>
>Code change at here is common for avoids walking page table and
>isolate hugepage in case architecture or page size are not supported
>for migration. Comments from code are copied here:
>
>static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(...)
>{
> /*
> * Migratability of hugepages depends on architectures and their size.
> * This check is necessary because some callers of hugepage migration
> * like soft offline and memory hotremove don't walk through page
> * tables or check whether the hugepage is pmd-based or not before
> * kicking migration.
> */
> if (!hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(hpage))) {
> putback_active_hugepage(hpage);
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
>}
>
>For current code change, we are able to know the 'hstate' because we have 'vma', so
>do early check instead of later.
>
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200117111629898234212@gmail.com/
Revise with more details on changelog for reason why this patch
is need. Thanks for your comments.
---
vma_migratable() is called to check if pages in vma can be migrated
before go ahead to further actions. Currently it is used in below code
path:
- task_numa_work (kernel\sched\fair.c)
- mbind (mm\mempolicy.c)
- move_pages (mm\migrate.c)
For hugetlb mapping, vma is migratable or not is determined by:
- CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION
- arch_hugetlb_migration_supported
Issue: current code only checks for CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION.
This patch checks the two factors to impove code logic. Besides, caller
of vma_migratable can take action properly in case architecture don't
support migration, e.g., mbind don't go further to try isolating/moving
pages, but currently it do continue because vma_migratable say yes.
No adding for Fix tag, since vma_migratable was implemented before
arch_hugetlb_migration_supported, it is up to the caller to use it.
---
>>>--
>>>Michal Hocko
>>>SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-18 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 4:11 [PATCH v4] mm/mempolicy,hugetlb: Checking hstate for hugetlbfs page in vma_migratable Li Xinhai
2020-01-16 9:56 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-16 13:50 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-16 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-16 15:38 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-17 3:16 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-18 3:11 ` Li Xinhai [this message]
2020-01-18 15:27 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-20 10:12 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-20 15:37 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-20 16:05 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-21 3:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-21 13:08 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-21 12:44 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-20 9:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-20 11:32 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-21 3:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-20 14:19 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-22 6:05 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-22 13:21 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-23 7:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200118111121432688303@gmail.com \
--to=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).