From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE97C3F68F for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91A722464 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:24:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E91A722464 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9D6366B0656; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:24:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 960436B0657; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:24:09 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 826A86B0658; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:24:09 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0095.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.95]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E6C6B0656 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:24:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EC101269 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:24:09 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76398081018.27.work64_5e620e7325b40 X-HE-Tag: work64_5e620e7325b40 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4993 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) by imf33.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j42so29507873wrj.12 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:24:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xHYwI1c4dvmZ1Pb+9NFFerZpg3qzCoeSJtlv6Fl2OEo=; b=BXm6W20ypOwwntrEEEWisQzSdkuAC6AWNNxBs1RQ/gNEGYddSrBPZ+A30YDpFpnDM1 LS4wcCjqGUr9eMq0741IqI0D7AJDu5uuJL6r7fexDhWcXuD+fJK1cTra8o463x4JDLWU GUJITuUkZW4kdHiASQsCeRU0oIPV1BkjItllDmBZwXw0Q3bHu60KVUAi9PICrvlHZGmw 4Rb0DuajAVPUibEdGynUo9q0j371JjocbDUkpPjSqZzSrINtBYHFC+v+mKMUMXlE82rL GBSpqgeGNLz30XJoeui+DbGBxMncBYYjYdqqxgm9bIcvsip9uJ9mPMpB89CM69Ijap9G PbGg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXiUFSX7tkd502XPfFh1T+rOa3wjZ2pjvEUUKfYiLclGwuTCFOI TErj+JlYmLbFFzGxAFMMcqc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwz363seedT/u6ORqRmln0OxS4y1h1TOUeH8L2/nLGIXUtTnmYs+avUnskCxcR26g24PYSV5g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef4e:: with SMTP id c14mr18209651wrp.142.1579526647518; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (prg-ext-pat.suse.com. [213.151.95.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n67sm23630987wmf.46.2020.01.20.05.24.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:24:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:24:05 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Kirill Tkhai , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-mm , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, oleksandr@redhat.com, Suren Baghdasaryan , Tim Murray , Daniel Colascione , Sandeep Patil , Sonny Rao , Brian Geffon , Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , John Dias , christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, sjpark@amazon.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: introduce external memory hinting API Message-ID: <20200120132405.GF18451@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20200116235953.163318-1-minchan@kernel.org> <20200116235953.163318-3-minchan@kernel.org> <20200117115225.GV19428@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200120112722.GY18451@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200120123935.onlls7enjtzenbvt@box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120123935.onlls7enjtzenbvt@box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon 20-01-20 15:39:35, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:27:22PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 20-01-20 13:24:35, Kirill Tkhai wrote: [...] > > > Even two threads on common memory need a synchronization > > > to manage mappings in a sane way. Managing memory from two processes > > > is the same in principle, and the only difference is that another level > > > of synchronization is required. > > > > Well, not really. The operation might simply attempt to perform an > > operation on a specific memory area and get a failure if it doesn't > > reference the same object anymore. What I think we need is some form of > > a handle to operate on. In the past we have discussed several > > directions. I was proposing /proc/self/map_anon/ (analogous to > > map_files) where you could inspect anonymous memory and get a file > > handle for it. madvise would then operate on the fd and then there > > shouldn't be a real problem to revalidate that the object is still > > valid. But there was no general enthusiasm about that approach. There > > are likely some land mines on the way. > > Converting anon memory to file-backed is bad idea and going to backfire. I didn't mean to convert. I meant to expose that information via proc the same way we do for file backed mappings. That shouldn't really require to re-design the way how anonymous vma work IMO. But I haven't tried that so there might be many gotchas there. There are obvious things to think about though. Such fd cannot be sent to other processes (SCM stuff), mmap of the file would have to be disallowed and many others I am not aware of. I am not even pushing this direction because I am not convinced about how viable it is myself. But it would sound like a nice extension of the existing mechanism we have and a file based madvise sounds attractive to me as well because we already have that. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs