From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E491EC2D0B1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61A321741 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:51:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A61A321741 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 330766B0006; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:51:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2B8A86B0007; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:51:20 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1598D6B0008; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:51:20 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0245.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.245]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7C66B0006 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 04:51:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D805180AD802 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:51:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76451976678.18.meal81_7fed90a56ec0a X-HE-Tag: meal81_7fed90a56ec0a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4235 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:51:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EF4AFF6; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:51:10 +0100 From: Oscar Salvador To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Dan Williams , Alexander Duyck , Alexander Potapenko , Andy Lutomirski , Anshuman Khandual , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christian Borntraeger , Christophe Leroy , Dave Hansen , Fenghua Yu , Gerald Schaefer , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Halil Pasic , Heiko Carstens , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Ira Weiny , Jason Gunthorpe , Jun Yao , Logan Gunthorpe , Mark Rutland , Masahiro Yamada , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Mel Gorman , Michael Ellerman , Mike Rapoport , Pankaj Gupta , Paul Mackerras , Pavel Tatashin , Pavel Tatashin , Peter Zijlstra , Qian Cai , Rich Felker , Robin Murphy , Steve Capper , Thomas Gleixner , Tom Lendacky , Tony Luck , Vasily Gorbik , Vlastimil Babka , Wei Yang , Wei Yang , Will Deacon , Yoshinori Sato , Yu Zhao Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink zones before removing memory Message-ID: <20200204095110.GF6494@linux> References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> <20191203133633.GA2600@linux> <20200130204043.29e21049775e3a637db733e0@linux-foundation.org> <20200203174653.74630ef5744c68be55374b0d@linux-foundation.org> <78545b80-ea30-0d44-acb8-364312ae9595@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78545b80-ea30-0d44-acb8-364312ae9595@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:45:24AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I really hope we'll find more reviewers in general - I'm also not happy > if my patches go upstream with little/no review. However, patches > shouldn't be stuck for multiple merge windows in linux-next IMHO > (excluding exceptions of course) - then they should either be sent > upstream (and eventually fixed later) or dropped. First of all sorry for my lack of review, as lately I have been a bit disconnected of the list because lack of time. Lucky my I managed to find some time, so I went through the patches that did lack review (#6-#10). I hope this helps in moving forward the series, although Michal's review would be great as well. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3