From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E87C3F2D3 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602F121556 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QPAM2InI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 602F121556 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D383B6B0005; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:04:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CE8D76B0006; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:04:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BFD766B0007; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:04:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0250.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.250]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D566B0005 for ; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:04:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672BB181AEF21 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:04:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76545451668.15.power28_44fed47bf3c3e X-HE-Tag: power28_44fed47bf3c3e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2629 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf44.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C34BE20658; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:04:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583035473; bh=0JNvEb3Oe9lLFf2wYJ8fkwfOXwpITMyBmYV9rpsUprQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QPAM2InIOtf/BTM0mPFNHD4Eb/MLJlhIH6jVAWt0uUInAhIawWsbRac58Nc+GgYTi M9MVw6eqShud7jv5/E1kK+S0i8o9ir9g5e/3olstbMtBoHB1cmp1T7A/b/Zspds5DN 7TwRnQgkVa5KL9fUgefgyShO2VI5HnyBh2AF2gd8= Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:04:32 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= (VMware) Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralph Campbell , pv-drivers@vmware.com, Dan Williams , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Glisse , linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Huge page-table entries for TTM Message-Id: <20200229200432.55b5b64f46dc2f2f80fa7461@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20200220122719.4302-1-thomas_os@shipmail.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:08:04 +0100 Thomas Hellstr=F6m (VMware) wrote: > I'm wondering what's the best way here to get the patches touching mm=20 > reviewed and accepted? > While drm people and VMware internal people have looked at them, I think= =20 > the huge_fault() fallback splitting and the introduction of=20 > vma_is_special_huge() needs looking at more thoroughly. >=20 > Apart from that, if possible, I think the best way to merge this series=20 > is also through a DRM tree. Patches 1-3 look OK to me. I just had a few commenting/changelogging niggles.