From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7900C3F2D2 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85FB21D56 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AESyjToZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A85FB21D56 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 41A096B0005; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:42:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 3A3486B0006; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:42:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 26A6C6B0007; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:42:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0192.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.192]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA6E6B0005 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:42:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC93181AC9C6 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:42:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76550537406.03.songs61_51fa65936644b X-HE-Tag: songs61_51fa65936644b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5108 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 6so2778941wmi.5 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sEpI61AXMhQk+/7FRgpCLnFcPQkSVnPoQZAeagfx6ys=; b=AESyjToZUu4gv4B5N5XvM77kWp2ZhYaLupK1ZQJqpDx4a4CCjQfu/jqxbyZAX/RgKt rYQHo/iO0XliI8SeLLw3tT6z3Mh1it69mfikc6+UmS0YCtoKcSqLZMo/Osucieugl/8n MyFOeQ4DcnzLhvGSNWspHvMPwQONVKJ0AhRa0/bQVIYl2a4Sj+7L8bebkpjnNbn1LYBD MQKGyRhLgYcohdC3/RNrycprC8HfMM6SPGBRNTwa3aa8XRyb/Vg1vLboeXf+5GLeRrpR nJmWy1v3Nb8eyg+Biq4C037c+98DZdXBKNfjROLHRNb2Rgb9ZEWYXUJbrt7TGyxmLW9k ZJmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sEpI61AXMhQk+/7FRgpCLnFcPQkSVnPoQZAeagfx6ys=; b=cYEIBskag+q2Yw4ZViHhNTM//iXEt9PjNJ7b01KWlsrFbxOeKjZTuXvx8lE6TZjRav iQu8CnDJfkHwxeYSB40TNCpQ91838a3dj83tMdt+X8j4Dg2HUC6GSaKYfah2a3qek4ad UgwPjEPPdwAyIFXp4sHUvhxdpM9h73mmq+48aisvDsgBRMSNAOJ/DORghGt1w3IhLn4Z IKoiMQo/GULSFr8Dlts996TYi7Hm2Mw+oAuO/G+d9g01hgiL5Nf+cQNfnD03VqY4F0s6 GTF78WX5Iv3+Li825V0cI1FT1F/GTKpvbnOVdXMvq3dI2K48wj4H9/Ul3eAkf1C8VMjW g9RA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5LqB95qov1Fz2tagq1FY8UXhQuC922Zy2hCBtVMNb664DZ6WF 4KUEX9Pl+c7cbH1ipQqe/iptPhhG X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpj6QHHeJQgvkTZb7OrMvzHfNPEFpnzqAPc4r2kDX4obZp3lH0Q5h1vucsMBWn7C9J4QpJlw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9602:: with SMTP id y2mr19477104wmd.23.1583156561969; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z16sm27524843wrp.33.2020.03.02.05.42.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:42:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:42:40 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: Qian Cai Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, elver@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/swapfile: fix data races in try_to_unuse() Message-ID: <20200302134240.6i32e4qmgvqiztz2@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <1582578903-29294-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1582578903-29294-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:15:03PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote: >si->inuse_pages could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, > > write to 0xffff98b00ebd04dc of 4 bytes by task 82262 on cpu 92: > swap_range_free+0xbe/0x230 > swap_range_free at mm/swapfile.c:719 > swapcache_free_entries+0x1be/0x250 > free_swap_slot+0x1c8/0x220 > __swap_entry_free.constprop.19+0xa3/0xb0 > free_swap_and_cache+0x53/0xa0 > unmap_page_range+0x7e0/0x1ce0 > unmap_single_vma+0xcd/0x170 > unmap_vmas+0x18b/0x220 > exit_mmap+0xee/0x220 > mmput+0xe7/0x240 > do_exit+0x598/0xfd0 > do_group_exit+0x8b/0x180 > get_signal+0x293/0x13d0 > do_signal+0x37/0x5d0 > prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1b7/0x2c0 > ret_from_intr+0x32/0x42 > > read to 0xffff98b00ebd04dc of 4 bytes by task 82499 on cpu 46: > try_to_unuse+0x86b/0xc80 > try_to_unuse at mm/swapfile.c:2185 > __x64_sys_swapoff+0x372/0xd40 > do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > >The plain reads in try_to_unuse() are outside si->lock critical section >which result in data races that could be dangerous to be used in a loop. >Fix them by adding READ_ONCE(). > >Signed-off-by: Qian Cai >--- > mm/swapfile.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c >index a65622eec66f..36fd1536a83d 100644 >--- a/mm/swapfile.c >+++ b/mm/swapfile.c >@@ -2137,7 +2137,7 @@ int try_to_unuse(unsigned int type, bool frontswap, > swp_entry_t entry; > unsigned int i; > >- if (!si->inuse_pages) >+ if (!READ_ONCE(si->inuse_pages)) > return 0; > > if (!frontswap) >@@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ int try_to_unuse(unsigned int type, bool frontswap, > > spin_lock(&mmlist_lock); > p = &init_mm.mmlist; >- while (si->inuse_pages && >+ while (READ_ONCE(si->inuse_pages) && The change is not wrong. But since it is not protected by the lock, some status in swap_info_struct could still be modified after we test this inuse_pages is not zero. Would this be some problem? -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me