* [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2020-03-11 0:12 kbuild test robot
2020-03-11 0:12 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next] mtd: __del_mtd_partitions() can be static kbuild test robot
2020-03-11 1:33 ` [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-03-11 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: 134546626849cd6852d6d4bf8f207b5fbc54261b
commit: 57b8b2d03dbd17e5d3c03489d7cd7985ea8286a0 [7020/7467] mtd: implement proper partition handling
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.1-174-g094d5a94-dirty
git checkout 57b8b2d03dbd17e5d3c03489d7cd7985ea8286a0
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH linux-next] mtd: __del_mtd_partitions() can be static
2020-03-11 0:12 [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2020-03-11 0:12 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-11 1:33 ` [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-03-11 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List
Fixes: 57b8b2d03dbd ("mtd: implement proper partition handling")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
mtdpart.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
index 93ef8fdf1634b0..3f6025684f5890 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int __mtd_del_partition(struct mtd_info *mtd)
* This function unregisters and destroy all slave MTD objects which are
* attached to the given MTD object, recursively.
*/
-int __del_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+static int __del_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct mtd_info *child, *next;
LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static?
2020-03-11 0:12 [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2020-03-11 0:12 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next] mtd: __del_mtd_partitions() can be static kbuild test robot
@ 2020-03-11 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2020-03-11 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2020-03-11 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild test robot; +Cc: kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List, Miquel Raynal
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:12:05 +0800 kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 134546626849cd6852d6d4bf8f207b5fbc54261b
> commit: 57b8b2d03dbd17e5d3c03489d7cd7985ea8286a0 [7020/7467] mtd: implement proper partition handling
> reproduce:
> # apt-get install sparse
> # sparse version: v0.6.1-174-g094d5a94-dirty
> git checkout 57b8b2d03dbd17e5d3c03489d7cd7985ea8286a0
> make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
> make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
> >> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
>
Something has gone screwy lately. This is not a -mm patch and I've
never seen it before!
Let's Cc the author, Miquel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static?
2020-03-11 1:33 ` [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? Andrew Morton
@ 2020-03-11 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2020-03-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: kbuild test robot, kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List
Hello,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2020
18:33:08 -0700:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:12:05 +0800 kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> > head: 134546626849cd6852d6d4bf8f207b5fbc54261b
> > commit: 57b8b2d03dbd17e5d3c03489d7cd7985ea8286a0 [7020/7467] mtd: implement proper partition handling
> > reproduce:
> > # apt-get install sparse
> > # sparse version: v0.6.1-174-g094d5a94-dirty
> > git checkout 57b8b2d03dbd17e5d3c03489d7cd7985ea8286a0
> > make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
> > make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> >
> > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >
> > >> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
> >
>
> Something has gone screwy lately. This is not a -mm patch and I've
> never seen it before!
>
> Let's Cc the author, Miquel.
This is indeed a patch that I applied recently on mtd/next, pulled in
linux-next. I have no idea why you did receive this bug report though
:)
That was actually the first time working with sparse for me, it took me
some time (and a lot of build time) to figure out that I had to use the
exact same sparse version has you in order to get the warning (I was
using Ubuntu's stable 0.6.0-3 version).
However I got it working and fixed this trivial but real issue in my
code.
Thanks,
Miquèl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-11 13:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-11 0:12 [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2020-03-11 0:12 ` [RFC PATCH linux-next] mtd: __del_mtd_partitions() can be static kbuild test robot
2020-03-11 1:33 ` [linux-next:master 7020/7467] drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c:318:5: sparse: sparse: symbol '__del_mtd_partitions' was not declared. Should it be static? Andrew Morton
2020-03-11 13:57 ` Miquel Raynal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).