linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: "Longpeng (Mike,
	Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)"
	<longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arei.gonglei@huawei.com,
	weidong.huang@huawei.com, weifuqiang@huawei.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: fix a addressing exception caused by huge_pte_offset()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:40:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323144030.GA28711@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e16fe81b-5c4c-e689-2f48-214f2025df2f@oracle.com>

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 07:54:32PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 3/22/20 7:03 PM, Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.) wrote:
> > 
> > On 2020/3/22 7:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> On 2/21/20 7:33 PM, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> >>> From: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> I have not looked closely at the generated code for lookup_address_in_pgd.
> It appears that it would dereference p4d, pud and pmd multiple times.  Sean
> seemed to think there was something about the calling context that would
> make issues like those seen with huge_pte_offset less likely to happen.  I
> do not know if this is accurate or not.

Only for KVM's calls to lookup_address_in_mm(), I can't speak to other
calls that funnel into to lookup_address_in_pgd().

KVM uses a combination of tracking and blocking mmu_notifier calls to ensure
PTE changes/invalidations between gup() and lookup_address_in_pgd() cause a
restart of the faulting instruction, and that pending changes/invalidations
are blocked until installation of the pfn in KVM's secondary MMU completes.

kvm_mmu_page_fault():

	mmu_seq = kvm->mmu_notifier_seq;
	smp_rmb();

	pfn = gup(hva);

	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
	smp_rmb();
	if (kvm->mmu_notifier_seq != mmu_seq)
		goto out_unlock: // Restart guest, i.e. retry the fault

	lookup_address_in_mm(hva, ...);

	...

  out_unlock:
	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);


kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte() / kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end():

	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
	kvm->mmu_notifier_seq++;
	smp_wmb();
	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);


> Let's remove the two READ_ONCE calls and move this patch forward.  We can
> look closer at lookup_address_in_pgd and generate another patch if that needs
> to be fixed as well.
> 
> Thanks
> -- 
> Mike Kravetz


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-22  3:33 [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: fix a addressing exception caused by huge_pte_offset() Longpeng(Mike)
2020-03-21 23:38 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-23  2:03   ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2020-03-23  2:54     ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-23  3:43       ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2020-03-23 14:40       ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-23 16:44         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-23 16:09   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-23 17:27     ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-23 18:07       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-23 20:35         ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-23 22:52           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-24  2:37             ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2020-03-24 11:55               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-24 15:25                 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-24 15:55                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-24 16:19                     ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-24 17:59                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-24 19:47                         ` Mike Kravetz
2020-02-22  5:23 Qian Cai
2020-02-22  6:33 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2020-02-22 11:50   ` Qian Cai
2020-02-22 17:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-02-23  1:24     ` Longpeng (Mike)
2020-02-27 21:41       ` Mike Kravetz
2020-03-21 22:46         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200323144030.GA28711@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
    --cc=weifuqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).