From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: "Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/mmu_notifier: prevent unpaired invalidate_start and invalidate_end
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:56:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326145649.GL13183@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B33893E4-8561-4FAC-840F-E84F3FE5E8AC@lca.pw>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:06:12AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 11, 2020, at 3:52 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote:
> >
> > Many users of the mmu_notifier invalidate_range callbacks maintain
> > locking/counters/etc on a paired basis and have long expected that
> > invalidate_range_start/end() are always paired.
> >
> > For instance kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() undoes
> > kvm->mmu_notifier_count which was incremented during start().
> >
> > The recent change to add non-blocking notifiers breaks this assumption
> > when multiple notifiers are present in the list. When EAGAIN is returned
> > from an invalidate_range_start() then no invalidate_range_ends() are
> > called, even if the subscription's start had previously been called.
> >
> > Unfortunately, due to the RCU list traversal we can't reliably generate a
> > subset of the linked list representing the notifiers already called to
> > generate an invalidate_range_end() pairing.
> >
> > One case works correctly, if only one subscription requires
> > invalidate_range_end() and it is the last entry in the hlist. In this
> > case, when invalidate_range_start() returns -EAGAIN there will be nothing
> > to unwind.
> >
> > Keep the notifier hlist sorted so that notifiers that require
> > invalidate_range_end() are always last, and if two are added then disable
> > non-blocking invalidation for the mm.
> >
> > A warning is printed for this case, if in future we determine this never
> > happens then we can simply fail during registration when there are
> > unsupported combinations of notifiers.
>
> This will generate a warning when running a simple qemu-kvm on arm64,
>
> qemu-kvm (37712) created two mmu_notifier's with
> invalidate_range_end(): kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end and
> kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end, non-blocking notifiers
> disabled
Thank you Qian, this is very valuable information
It seems this solution will not work if kvm is registering multiple
notifiers.
I will take the patch out of linux-next
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 20:52 [PATCH v3] mm/mmu_notifier: prevent unpaired invalidate_start and invalidate_end Jason Gunthorpe
2020-02-11 21:28 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-02-11 23:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-02-28 13:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-24 19:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-25 8:01 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-25 12:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-25 13:06 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-26 13:06 ` Qian Cai
2020-03-26 14:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200326145649.GL13183@mellanox.com \
--to=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).