linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	peterx@redhat.com,
	syzbot+a8c70b7f3579fc0587dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm/gup: Mark lock taken only after a successful retake
Date: Tue,  7 Apr 2020 21:40:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200408014010.80428-3-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408014010.80428-1-peterx@redhat.com>

It's definitely incorrect to mark the lock as taken even if
down_read_killable() failed.  It's overlooked when we switched from
down_read() to down_read_killable() because down_read() won't fail
while down_read_killable() could.

Reported-by: syzbot+a8c70b7f3579fc0587dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 71335f37c5e8 ("mm/gup: allow to react to fatal signals")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/gup.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index da3e03185144..1f9a9b3a5869 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1328,7 +1328,6 @@ static __always_inline long __get_user_pages_locked(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
 			break;
 
-		*locked = 1;
 		ret = down_read_killable(&mm->mmap_sem);
 		if (ret) {
 			BUG_ON(ret > 0);
@@ -1337,6 +1336,7 @@ static __always_inline long __get_user_pages_locked(struct task_struct *tsk,
 			break;
 		}
 
+		*locked = 1;
 		ret = __get_user_pages(tsk, mm, start, 1, flags | FOLL_TRIED,
 				       pages, NULL, locked);
 		if (!*locked) {
-- 
2.24.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-08  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-08  1:40 [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports Peter Xu
2020-04-08  1:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mempolicy: Allow lookup_node() to handle fatal signal Peter Xu
2020-04-08 10:21   ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-08 14:20     ` Peter Xu
2020-04-08 14:30       ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-08 15:24         ` Peter Xu
2020-04-08 15:26           ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-09  7:02   ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-09 12:52     ` Peter Xu
2020-04-09 13:00       ` Peter Xu
2020-04-09 13:53       ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-09 16:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-14 11:04       ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-14 13:49         ` Peter Xu
2020-04-14 14:18           ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-20 12:47         ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-20 17:31           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-21  7:09             ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-08  1:40 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-04-09  0:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports Andrew Morton
2020-04-09 11:49   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-09 13:00     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-09 18:16       ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-09 18:53         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 19:12           ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-09 19:46             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 19:56               ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-09 19:58                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 20:27                   ` Eric Biggers
2020-04-09 20:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 23:34                       ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-10  1:11                       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-04-09 12:55   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-09 16:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 16:58       ` Qian Cai
2020-04-09 17:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 17:58           ` Qian Cai
2020-04-09 18:06             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 21:14               ` Qian Cai
2020-04-10 13:12                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-04-10 14:26                   ` Qian Cai
2020-04-10 17:26                     ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-10 19:46                       ` Qian Cai
2020-04-09 23:29       ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-13 22:06         ` Qian Cai
2020-04-13 23:05           ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-14 11:12           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 11:59             ` Qian Cai
2020-04-14 12:05               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 19:28             ` Dan Rue
2020-04-15 11:09               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-15 16:23                 ` Dan Rue
2020-04-16  0:34             ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-11 15:29               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14  4:07         ` Hillf Danton
2020-04-14  4:31           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200408014010.80428-3-peterx@redhat.com \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=syzbot+a8c70b7f3579fc0587dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).