From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA21C2BA2B for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 01:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F7720757 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 01:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ztxG2mAF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 99F7720757 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 230038E000D; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:29:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 191FC8E0006; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:29:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 00B7A8E000D; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:29:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0234.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.234]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AB98E0006 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:29:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D032180AD806 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 01:29:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76686585276.11.shoe70_7428d6babd84f X-HE-Tag: shoe70_7428d6babd84f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2375 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf49.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 01:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 064EF20757; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586395797; bh=0ExF8hpxnlSLtMALvYNmfmZTu6i+F10IVV6f93faS+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ztxG2mAFQCMeNBlQuTVRO1R0jM6tzTm6rPO+fasMIKOGa5CaVDEZwL+SVeduiXpnr TjyV5ckbo65X5I088i+eZDk+kV6Guy7ohtHDOpUSRbBHnHo9CjGFripLQ1WgCz6kf6 y4pkK+cdrKm9OQalQpbVSwbcbHWTZhM9cUa+jT08= Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:29:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko , Yafang Shao , Matthew Wilcox , Vladimir Davydov , Linux MM Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, memcg: fix error return value of mem_cgroup_css_alloc() Message-Id: <20200408182956.0906ebc4f8ec421689ec6df5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200407181012.GA12461@cmpxchg.org> References: <1586192163-20099-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <20200406162343.6ae4b8f74c74bcb84d026471@linux-foundation.org> <20200406200916.2623f34403155264d8c8e9e7@linux-foundation.org> <20200407064329.GB18914@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200407111017.GN18914@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200407181012.GA12461@cmpxchg.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:10:12 -0400 Johannes Weiner wrote: > Given how unlikely this is to affect real setups, I don't think this > patch is stable material. OK, thanks, done. I didn't notice any acks - is this patch otherwise good to go upstream?