From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 5/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:38:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414033804.GO11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64c9212d-aaa3-d172-0ab9-0fc0e25a019a@acm.org>
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 04:21:17PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-04-10 14:27, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:50 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:34 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:12:21PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>>> Please add a might_sleep() call in blk_put_queue() since with this patch
> >>>> applied it is no longer allowed to call blk_put_queue() from atomic context.
> >>>
> >>> Sure thing.
> >>
> >> On second though, I don't think blk_put_queue() would be the right
> >> place for might_sleep(), given we really only care about the *last*
> >> refcount decrement to 0. So I'll move it to blk_release_queue().
> >> Granted, at that point we are too late, and we'd get a splat about
> >> this issue *iff* we really sleep. So yeah, I do suppose that forcing
> >> this check there still makes sense.
> >
> > I'll add might_sleep() to both blk_release_queue() *and* blk_cleanup_queue().
>
> Since there is already an unconditional mutex_lock() call in
> blk_cleanup_queue(), do we really need to add a might_sleep() call in
> blk_cleanup_queue()?
You are right, mutex_lock() already has a might_sleep() sprinkled on it.
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-09 21:45 [RFC v2 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 1/5] block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 2:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 2/5] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 2:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-10 19:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-11 23:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-14 3:32 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 3/5] blktrace: ref count the request_queue during ioctl Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 2:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 4/5] mm/swapfile: refcount block and queue before using blkcg_schedule_throttle() Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 3:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-10 14:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 5/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 3:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-10 14:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 20:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 21:27 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-11 23:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-14 3:38 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200414033804.GO11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).