linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 08:09:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422060922.GA22775@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422024626.GI23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:46:26AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Better allocate count + 1 bytes here, that way a lot of insanity in the
> > instances can be simply converted to snprintf().  Yes, I know it'll bring
> > the Church Of Avoiding The Abomination Of Sprintf out of the woodwork,
> > but...
> 
> FWIW, consider e.g. net/sunrpc/sysctl.c:
> 
> Nevermind that the read side should be simply
> 		int err = proc_douintvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> 		/* Display the RPC tasks on writing to rpc_debug */
> 		if (!err && strcmp(table->procname, "rpc_debug") == 0)
> 			rpc_show_tasks(&init_net);
> 		return err;
> the write side would become
> 		len = snprintf(buffer, *lenp + 1, "0x%04x\n",
> 				*(unsigned int *)table->data);
> 		if (len > *lenp)
> 			len = *lenp;
> 		*lenp -= len;
> 		*ppos += len;
> 		return 0;
> and I really wonder if lifting the trailing boilerplate into the caller would've
> been better.  Note that e.g. gems like
>                         if (!first)
>                                 err = proc_put_char(&buffer, &left, '\t');
>                         if (err)
>                                 break;
>                         err = proc_put_long(&buffer, &left, lval, neg);
>                         if (err)
>                                 break;
> are due to lack of snprintf-to-user; now, lose the "to user" part and we suddenly
> can be rid of that stuff...

That sounds pretty sensible, but can we do that as an extra step?
That is in merge window N just move to passing kernel pointers, check
for fall out.  In merge window N + 1 start allocatin the extra byte and
switch at least the common helpers for snprintf?


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-21 17:15 pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] bpf-cgroup: remove unused exports Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22 23:39   ` Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove watermark_boost_factor_sysctl_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 19:31   ` David Rientjes
2020-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] sysctl: remove all extern declaration from sysctl.c Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22 10:30   ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 17:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] sysctl: avoid forward declarations Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 19:16   ` Al Viro
2020-04-22  2:46     ` Al Viro
2020-04-22  6:09       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-04-21 19:23   ` Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-22 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22 23:40       ` Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-24  6:43 pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24 19:06   ` Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-27  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 19:01   ` Kees Cook
2020-05-05  5:57     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200422060922.GA22775@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).