linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:59:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200426155958.GS23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424064338.538313-1-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:43:33AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series changes the sysctl ->proc_handler methods to take kernel
> pointers.  This simplifies some of the pointer handling in the methods
> (which could probably be further simplified now), and gets rid of the
> set_fs address space overrides used by bpf.
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  - free the buffer modified by BPF
>  - move pid_max and friends to pid.h
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - drop a patch merged by Greg
>  - don't copy data out on a write
>  - fix buffer allocation in bpf

OK, I can live with that; further work can live on top of that, anyway.
How are we going to handle that?  I can put it into never-rebased branch
in vfs.git (#work.sysctl), so that people could pull that.

FWIW, I'm putting together more uaccess stuff (will probably hit -next
tonight or tomorrow); this would fit well there...


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-26 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24  6:43 pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] bpf-cgroup: remove unused exports Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove watermark_boost_factor_sysctl_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 18:41   ` Kees Cook
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] sysctl: remove all extern declaration from sysctl.c Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04  1:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-04 18:42   ` Kees Cook
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] sysctl: avoid forward declarations Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 18:44   ` Kees Cook
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24 19:06   ` Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-27  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 19:01   ` Kees Cook
2020-05-05  5:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 15:51 ` pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Alexei Starovoitov
2020-04-27  5:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 15:59 ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-04-27  5:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-27  7:15     ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200426155958.GS23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).