linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bvanassche@acm.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz,
	ming.lei@redhat.com, nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mhocko@suse.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] loop: be paranoid on exit and prevent new additions / removals
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 09:09:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200503090923.GP11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200429095034.GC2081185@kroah.com>

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:50:34AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 07:46:27AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > Be pedantic on removal as well and hold the mutex.
> > This should prevent uses of addition while we exit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/loop.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> > index da693e6a834e..6dccba22c9b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> > @@ -2333,6 +2333,8 @@ static void __exit loop_exit(void)
> >  
> >  	range = max_loop ? max_loop << part_shift : 1UL << MINORBITS;
> >  
> > +	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
> > +
> >  	idr_for_each(&loop_index_idr, &loop_exit_cb, NULL);
> >  	idr_destroy(&loop_index_idr);
> >  
> > @@ -2340,6 +2342,8 @@ static void __exit loop_exit(void)
> >  	unregister_blkdev(LOOP_MAJOR, "loop");
> >  
> >  	misc_deregister(&loop_misc);
> > +
> > +	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
> >  }
> >  
> >  module_init(loop_init);
> 
> What type of issue is this helping with?  Can it be triggered today?  if
> so, shouldn't it be backported to stable kernels?

Just code inspection. I can't trigger a userspace test script to crash
the kernel yet, but suspect a race still does exist.

  Luis


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-03  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29  7:46 [PATCH v3 0/6] block: fix blktrace debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29  7:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29 11:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-02  0:22   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-05-03 10:32     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-04 16:18       ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-05-04 16:16     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29  7:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29 11:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29  7:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] blktrace: move blktrace debugfs creation to helper function Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29 11:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-02  0:25   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-29  7:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29  9:47   ` Greg KH
2020-04-29 11:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 11:45     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29 11:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 12:02         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29 12:04           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 12:21             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29 12:57               ` Greg KH
2020-05-01 15:24                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-05-07 11:30   ` [blktrace] d106a3fdba: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
2020-04-29  7:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] blktrace: break out of blktrace setup on concurrent calls Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29  9:49   ` Greg KH
2020-05-01 15:06     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-05-01 15:34       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:40         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-05-01 15:50           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-05-01 16:51       ` Greg KH
2020-04-29  7:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] loop: be paranoid on exit and prevent new additions / removals Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-29  9:50   ` Greg KH
2020-05-03  9:09     ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-04-29 14:05   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200503090923.GP11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).