From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings()
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 11:25:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200509092516.GC2957@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200508213407.GT8135@suse.de>
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 11:34:07PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> thanks for reviewing this!
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:20:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The only concern I have is the pgd_lock lock hold times.
> >
> > By not doing on-demand faults anymore, and consistently calling
> > sync_global_*(), we iterate that pgd_list thing much more often than
> > before if I'm not mistaken.
>
> Should not be a problem, from what I have seen this function is not
> called often on x86-64. The vmalloc area needs to be synchronized at
> the top-level there, which is by now P4D (with 4-level paging). And the
> vmalloc area takes 64 entries, when all of them are populated the
> function will not be called again.
Right; it's just that the moment you do trigger it, it'll iterate that
pgd_list and that is potentially huge. Then again, that's not a new
problem.
I suppose we can deal with it if/when it becomes an actual problem.
I had a quick look and I think it might be possible to make it an RCU
managed list. We'd have to remove the pgd_list entry in
put_task_struct_rcu_user(). Then we can play games in sync_global_*()
and use RCU iteration. New tasks (which can be missed in the RCU
iteration) will already have a full clone of the PGD anyway.
But like said, something for later I suppose.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-09 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 14:40 [RFC PATCH 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] mm: Add functions to track page directory modifications Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] mm/vmalloc: Track which page-table levels were modified Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 19:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 21:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] mm/ioremap: " Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] x86/mm/64: Implement arch_sync_kernel_mappings() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/mm/32: " Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] mm: Remove vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 18:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-08 21:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] x86/mm: Remove vmalloc faulting Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 21:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-09 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-05-09 17:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-10 1:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 15:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11 16:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 21:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-08 21:36 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 23:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-09 17:52 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-09 19:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-09 21:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-10 5:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-10 8:15 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-11 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 15:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-11 17:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 19:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-11 19:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-12 15:02 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-12 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-11 20:50 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200509092516.GC2957@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).