linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/16] rcu/tree: Skip entry into the page allocator for PREEMPT_RT
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:47:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525214800.93072-3-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525214800.93072-1-urezki@gmail.com>

From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>

To keep the kfree_rcu() code working in purely atomic sections on RT,
such as non-threaded IRQ handlers and raw spinlock sections, avoid
calling into the page allocator which uses sleeping locks on RT.

In fact, even if the  caller is preemptible, the kfree_rcu() code is
not, as the krcp->lock is a raw spinlock.

Calling into the page allocator is optional and avoiding it should be
Ok, especially with the page pre-allocation support in future patches.
Such pre-allocation would further avoid the a need for a dynamically
allocated page in the first place.

Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 6e967a9d6704..d28010cf158b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3068,6 +3068,18 @@ kfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
 		if (!bnode) {
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(sizeof(struct kfree_rcu_bulk_data) > PAGE_SIZE);
 
+			/*
+			 * To keep this path working on raw non-preemptible
+			 * sections, prevent the optional entry into the
+			 * allocator as it uses sleeping locks. In fact, even
+			 * if the caller of kfree_rcu() is preemptible, this
+			 * path still is not, as krcp->lock is a raw spinlock.
+			 * With additional page pre-allocation in the works,
+			 * hitting this return is going to be much less likely.
+			 */
+			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+				return false;
+
 			bnode = (struct kfree_rcu_bulk_data *)
 				__get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
 		}
-- 
2.20.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-25 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-25 21:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] Introduce kvfree_rcu(1 or 2 arguments) Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] rcu/tree: Keep kfree_rcu() awake during lock contention Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] rcu/tree: Repeat the monitor if any free channel is busy Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] rcu/tree: Make debug_objects logic independent of rcu_head Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] rcu/tree: Simplify KFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR macro Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] rcu/tree: Move kfree_rcu_cpu locking/unlocking to separate functions Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-06-17 23:46   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18  0:52     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18  3:18       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 17:35         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:57           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 18:34             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 19:03               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 20:35                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 20:38                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 21:17                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 21:34                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 15:46                         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-19 16:25                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-22 19:04                             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-22 19:53                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-30 17:46                                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:30       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:35         ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 20:03           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:25     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:32       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 17:56         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 18:15           ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 18:23             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 18:37               ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 18:48                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] rcu/tiny: support vmalloc in tiny-RCU Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] rcu: Rename *_kfree_callback/*_kfree_rcu_offset/kfree_call_* Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local variant Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] rcu: Introduce 2 arg kvfree_rcu() interface Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] rcu: Support reclaim for head-less object Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] rcu: Introduce single argument kvfree_rcu() interface Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Add test cases for kvfree_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200525214800.93072-3-urezki@gmail.com \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).