From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/19] kselftests: cgroup: add kernel memory accounting tests
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:45:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527204522.GE396660@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63bc0cb9-b803-d3d9-5e61-706f81fb8a78@suse.cz>
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:00:30PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/26/20 5:45 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> 1 << 20 ?
> >>
> >> Anyway I was getting this:
> >> not ok 1 test_kmem_basic
> >> ok 2 test_kmem_memcg_deletion
> >> ok 3 test_kmem_proc_kpagecgroup
> >> not ok 4 test_kmem_kernel_stacks
> >> ok 5 test_kmem_dead_cgroups
> >>
> >> Adding some debugging into kmem_basic I found I get memory.stat == 0 at this
> >> point thus it fails the fixed test (otherwise it was failing the <= 0 test after
> >> writing to memory.high). But it's just a VM spinned by virtme which has a very
> >> simple init, so perhaps things are not as initialized as expected.
> >
> > Hm, it's strange, do you have any values in memory.stat::slab for any cgroups?
> > Or can you send me your config (and kvm setup), I'll take a look.
>
> Config is attached, KVM setup is just running virtme [1] on the git gree where I
> compiled the kernel:
>
> virtme-run --mods=auto --kdir /path/to/linux.git/
Thanks!
So, test_kmem_kernel_stacks fails because there is not enough memory in your setup:
it tries to spawn 1000 threads, and virtme-run sets the total memory in 100M,
which is not enough. Adding --memory 4G option makes the test pass.
>
> So there's only the cgroup the test creates, and the memry.stat::slab is zero
> after alloc_dcache(). Although I can see by strace that it does all those
> stat()'s. Also /proc/slabinfo also doesn't seem to be increasing number of
> dentries. Could be that because root fs is 9p in virtme?
The basic test seems to fail because of 9p. It also fails on the unpatched
kernel, so it's definitely not a regression.
So, maybe it's better to allocate kernel memory in the test using a different
method? I'm open for any ideas here.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 20:46 [PATCH v3 00/19] The new cgroup slab memory controller Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] mm: memcg: factor out memcg- and lruvec-level changes out of __mod_lruvec_state() Roman Gushchin
2020-05-07 20:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-20 10:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] mm: memcg: prepare for byte-sized vmstat items Roman Gushchin
2020-05-07 20:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-20 11:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-20 11:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] mm: memcg: convert vmstat slab counters to bytes Roman Gushchin
2020-05-07 20:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-20 12:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-20 19:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-21 9:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-21 21:14 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] mm: slub: implement SLUB version of obj_to_index() Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 23:52 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-04-23 0:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-25 2:10 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-04-25 2:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-27 16:21 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-04-27 16:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-28 17:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-28 17:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-30 16:29 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-04-30 17:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-02 23:54 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-05-04 18:29 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-08 21:35 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-05-13 0:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-15 21:45 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-05-15 22:12 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-20 9:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-20 20:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-15 20:02 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-23 21:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-25 2:10 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-05-20 13:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-20 21:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-21 11:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-21 21:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] mm: memcontrol: decouple reference counting from page accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API Roman Gushchin
2020-05-07 21:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-07 22:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-12 22:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-15 22:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] mm: memcg/slab: allocate obj_cgroups for non-root slab pages Roman Gushchin
2020-04-23 20:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-22 18:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-23 1:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 17:50 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-25 14:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] mm: memcg/slab: save obj_cgroup for non-root slab objects Roman Gushchin
2020-05-25 15:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-26 17:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-27 11:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects instead of pages Roman Gushchin
2020-05-25 16:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-26 18:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] mm: memcg/slab: deprecate memory.kmem.slabinfo Roman Gushchin
2020-05-07 21:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] mm: memcg/slab: move memcg_kmem_bypass() to memcontrol.h Roman Gushchin
2020-05-25 17:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all accounted allocations Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 10:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] mm: memcg/slab: simplify memcg cache creation Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 10:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] mm: memcg/slab: deprecate memcg_kmem_get_cache() Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 10:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] mm: memcg/slab: deprecate slab_root_caches Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 10:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-26 18:50 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] mm: memcg/slab: remove redundant check in memcg_accumulate_slabinfo() Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 11:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all allocations Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 14:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-27 8:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] kselftests: cgroup: add kernel memory accounting tests Roman Gushchin
2020-05-26 15:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-26 15:45 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-27 17:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-27 20:45 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-04-22 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] tools/cgroup: add memcg_slabinfo.py tool Roman Gushchin
2020-05-05 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200527204522.GE396660@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).