From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm, slub: extend slub_debug syntax for multiple blocks
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:06:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006051401.9AB3D2CAD@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200602141519.7099-2-vbabka@suse.cz>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The slub_debug kernel boot parameter can either apply a single set of options
> to all caches or a list of caches. There is a use case where debugging is
> applied for all caches and then disabled at runtime for specific caches, for
> performance and memory consumption reasons [1]. As runtime changes are
> dangerous, extend the boot parameter syntax so that multiple blocks of either
> global or slab-specific options can be specified, with blocks delimited by ';'.
> This will also support the use case of [1] without runtime changes.
>
> For details see the updated Documentation/vm/slub.rst
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1383cd32-1ddc-4dac-b5f8-9c42282fa81c@codeaurora.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> Documentation/vm/slub.rst | 17 ++
> mm/slub.c | 177 +++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 6253849afac2..6ea00c8dd635 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -4613,7 +4613,7 @@
> fragmentation. Defaults to 1 for systems with
> more than 32MB of RAM, 0 otherwise.
>
> - slub_debug[=options[,slabs]] [MM, SLUB]
> + slub_debug[=options[,slabs][;[options[,slabs]]...] [MM, SLUB]
> Enabling slub_debug allows one to determine the
> culprit if slab objects become corrupted. Enabling
> slub_debug can create guard zones around objects and
> diff --git a/Documentation/vm/slub.rst b/Documentation/vm/slub.rst
> index 4eee598555c9..f1154f707e06 100644
> --- a/Documentation/vm/slub.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/vm/slub.rst
> @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ slub_debug=<Debug-Options>,<slab name1>,<slab name2>,...
> Enable options only for select slabs (no spaces
> after a comma)
>
> +Multiple blocks of options for all slabs or selected slabs can be given, with
> +blocks of options delimited by ';'. The last of "all slabs" blocks is applied
> +to all slabs except those that match one of the "select slabs" block. Options
> +of the first "select slabs" blocks that matches the slab's name are applied.
> +
> Possible debug options are::
>
> F Sanity checks on (enables SLAB_DEBUG_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS
> @@ -83,6 +88,18 @@ in low memory situations or if there's high fragmentation of memory. To
>
> slub_debug=O
>
> +You can apply different options to different list of slab names, using blocks
> +of options. This will enable red zoning for dentry and user tracking for
> +kmalloc. All other slabs will not get any debugging enabled::
> +
> + slub_debug=Z,dentry;U,kmalloc-*
> +
> +You can also enable options (e.g. sanity checks and poisoning) for all caches
> +except some that are deemed too performance critical and don't need to be
> +debugged::
Just for more clarity, how about:
... debugged by starting the list with "-" (to mean "all except the
following")::
> +
> + slub_debug=FZ;-,zs_handle,zspage
> +
> In case you forgot to enable debugging on the kernel command line: It is
> possible to enable debugging manually when the kernel is up. Look at the
> contents of::
Everything else looks great; very nice! :)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-05 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-02 14:15 [RFC PATCH 0/5] replace runtime slub_debug toggling with more capable boot parameter Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-02 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm, slub: extend slub_debug syntax for multiple blocks Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-05 21:06 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-08 16:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-02 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm, slub: make some slub_debug related attributes read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-05 21:06 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-06 0:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-02 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm, slub: remove runtime allocation order changes Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-05 21:06 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-06 0:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-02 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] mm, slub: make remaining slub_debug related attributes read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-05 21:07 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-06 0:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-02 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] mm, slub: make reclaim_account attribute read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-05 21:07 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-06 0:34 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202006051401.9AB3D2CAD@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).